Search Results for "Small Causes Court jurisdiction"

812 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 812 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.

This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Policy in Loan Waiver Scheme for Small and Marginal Farmers Under Article 14 Scrutiny. Classification Based on Landholding Found Rational and Non-Arbitrary, with Judicial Review Limited to Constitutional Compliance, Not Policy Wisdom.

The dispute arose from a loan waiver scheme introduced by the Government of Tamil Nadu through G.O Ms. No. 50 dated 13 May 2016, which provided waiver...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Concurrent findings of default in payment of rent and subletting without consent upheld under Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Order 20 Rule 12 CPC.

The petitioners, Orbit Super Market Private Limited and the legal heirs of Dr. Shrikant Jichkar, challenged concurrent orders of the trial court and a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Case Under Bombay Rent Act for Encroachment and Change of User. Concurrent findings of fact on grounds under Section 13(1)(c) and Section 13(1)(a) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1974 upheld.

The petitioner, Laxmibai Ganpati Bhingare, was the tenant of an open plot admeasuring 30 sq.ft x 20 sq.ft in Sangli, owned by the respondent, Shivaji ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Second Appeal in Eviction Suit for Bonafide Need of Landlords. Concurrent Findings of Fact on Bonafide Requirement Cannot Be Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Vijay Shrihari Khandar, was a tenant in a part of a house bearing No.31 C.T.S. 2035, Sheet No.8 at Ramtek, owned by the respondents, Sh...