Search Results for "Section 28-A Land Acquisition Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 28-A Land Acquisition Act"

65 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 65 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement Denied Due to Lack of Evidence. Claimants Failed to Produce Comparable Sales Evidence Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Bhagirathibai Shivgonda Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Reference ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Reference Court's Award of Rs.5 Lakh for Sewerage Treatment Plant Land. Claimants' Restricted Claim Due to Financial Constraints Upheld as Compensation Was Based on Potentiality of Land as Residential.

12 Nov 2025

The Deputy Director Town Planning of Amravati Municipal Corporation appealed against the judgment and order of the Reference Court in L.A.C. No.215/20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Reference Court's Award of Rs.5 Lakh for Sewerage Treatment Plant Land. Claimants' Restricted Claim Due to Financial Constraints Does Not Bar Higher Compensation if Justified by Potential Value.

12 Nov 2025

The Deputy Director Town Planning of Amravati Municipal Corporation appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court in L.A.C. No.215/2003, which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Airport Appellate Tribunal Order in Eviction Proceedings under Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. Petitioner, an 85-year-old agriculturist, challenged the Tribunal's order confirming eviction from airport premises, raising issues of jurisdiction and unauthorized occupation.

30 Oct 2015

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the order dated 10th July 2013 passed by the Chairperson of the Airport Ap...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases for Airport Expansion — Upholds Single Judge's Refusal to Interfere with KIADB Acquisition. Landowners' challenge to acquisition for Hubli Airport expansion fails as court finds no violation of statutory provisions under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

28 Mar 2013

The case involves four writ appeals filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their land by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Legal Representatives' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Unexplained Delay and Procedural Lapses. Legal Representatives' Failure to Seek Leave to Appeal and Filing a False Affidavit Precluded Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

5 Nov 2025

The case arose from the acquisition of land belonging to H.D. Lokeshaiah in Halanuru village, Tumakuru Taluk, for the construction of the Hemavathi Ca...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Execution Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Limitation Runs from Date of Decree, Not Award. The court held that under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the 12-year limitation period for execution of a decree runs from the date of the decree (dismissal of appeal on 21.06.1991), not from the date of the award (31.07.1985), and thus the execution petition filed on 29.07.2005 was within time.

19 Jun 2013

The case involves a Civil Revision Petition filed by the decree holders (petitioners) against an order dated 18.03.2011 passed by the II Additional Ci...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of PIL and Writ Petition Challenging FSI Increase in Mumbai Suburbs under MRTP Act. Petitioners Contended Notifications Violated Article 14 and 21 and Amounted to Major Modification Not Permissible under Section 37 of MRTP Act.

10 Jun 2010

This incomplete judgment text of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, concerns two petitions: Public Interest...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Against SEBI's Attachment Orders – Appellants Challenge Levy of Retrospective Interest on Penalty Without Express Provision in Adjudication Order. The core question was whether the Recovery Officer could demand interest at 12% p.a. from the date of original adjudication orders under Section 28A SEBI Act read with Section 220 Income Tax Act in absence of a prior direction for interest, and whether Explanation 4 inserted in 2019 applies retrospectively to pre-existing orders.

26 Jul 2026

The appeals arose from the dismissal by the Securities Appellate Tribunal of challenges to attachment notices issued by the Securities and Exchange Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)