Search Results for "Section 221 Contract Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 221 Contract Act"

307 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 307 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Application, Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Development Agreement Dispute. Court holds that disputes regarding termination of a development agreement and recovery of possession are arbitrable, and that the arbitration clause survives termination of the agreement.

19 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Westin Sankalp Developers, a registered partnership firm, entered into a Development Agreement dated 30th April 2012 with the responde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

27 Apr 2018

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

10 May 2013

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

High Court

KAHC010023912010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Against Ombudsman's Order for Refund of Service Line Charges and Service Connection Charges. The court held that the Ombudsman had jurisdiction to entertain the consumer's complaint and that the charges were not recoverable upon restoration of contract demand.

7 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The Petitions, Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 Under Section 17(1) and (3) of BDA Act and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Under Section 19(1).

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging MPID Act Application in NSEL Scam Case — Held That MPID Act Applies to NSEL as a Financial Establishment and That Default in Repayment of Deposits Attracts Offences Under the Act.

7 Feb 2025

The judgment arises from multiple criminal appeals and interim applications filed by various parties, including directors, brokers, and financial inst...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Ceiling Case — Saving Clause Under Section 33(2) of Haryana Ceiling of Land Act, 1972 Excludes Application of New Act to Pending Proceedings Under Repealed Act. The Court Held That Determination of Surplus Area Includes Selection of Surplus Pool, and Vendees Cannot Claim Benefit of Sections 8(3) and 9(3) of the 1972 Act.

17 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the legal heirs of subsequent purchasers, Kirpal Singh and others, challenging the judgment of the Pun...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Vessel Maintenance Contract Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Patent Illegality. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation that the respondent was not liable for pre-existing HOTO defects, as the contract did not impose such liability.

18 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 2nd April, 2008 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)