Search Results for "Maharashtra Judicial Service Pension Rules"

148 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 148 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Principal of Blind School for Pension. State's Order Denying Pension Quashed as Arbitrary; Petitioner Entitled to Pension Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The petitioner, Smt. Shalan Shivaji Chavan, a retired Principal of Victoria Memorial High School for Blind, an aided institution, filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Assistant Teacher Seeking Extension of Service Beyond 58 Years and 7th Pay Commission Benefits. Employee Born on 1st of Month Retires on Last Day of Preceding Month Under Rule 17 of MEPS Rules, 1981.

The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher born on 01.01.1958, was superannuated on 31.12.2015 upon completing 58 years of age. He contended that he should ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Recommendation by Review Committee before amendment of Rule 19 cannot be basis for order under amended rule without fresh consideration.

The petitioner, a Judicial Officer, challenged an order of compulsory retirement dated 28.09.2011 passed under the Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claims of Resigned Judicial Officers in Service Law Dispute. Resignation Does Not Forfeit Statutory Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Judicial Officers with Over 12 Years of Service.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by former judicial officers of the Maharashtra State Judicial Service. The petitioners, Jeevan Kashinat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of District Judge Due to Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks. Adverse CR Entries Without Communication Violate Principles of Natural Justice Under Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008.

The petitioner, a judicial officer, challenged an order dated 26 February 2010 passed by the Principal Secretary and Legal Advisor, Law and Justice De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Inadequate Disposal Record. Rule 10(4)(a)(i) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 applied to compulsorily retire an Additional District Judge based on consistently inadequate disposal and adverse remarks.

The petitioner, Govind Laxmanrao Edke, was a judicial officer who entered service as a Civil Judge, Junior Division in June 1980, was promoted to Civi...