Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Untrained Primary Teachers Against Termination for Lack of D.Ed Qualification. Services terminated after 20-28 years of continuous employment without complaint; court holds that termination without considering long service and without providing opportunity to acquire qualification is unsustainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 37
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Kaliram S/o Budhaji Usendi and Baburao Komti Usendi, were appointed as untrained primary teachers on 09/01/2000 and 01/12/1992 respectively by the Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, following due process as D.Ed holder candidates from ST category were not available. They served continuously without any complaint until their services were terminated by order dated 27/05/2020 solely on the ground that they had not acquired the requisite D.Ed qualification. The petitioners challenged the termination before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The court noted that the petitioners had served for 20-28 years and there were no complaints against them. The respondent Zilla Parishad relied on a communication dated 04/01/2024 rejecting the petitioners' representations based on Rule 101 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. The petitioners' counsel relied on a judgment in Writ Petition No. 6143/2016 (Smt. Umabai W/o Ramkrishna Deshmukh vs. State of Maharashtra & others) where the Aurangabad Bench of this court had allowed similar petitions. The court found that the termination was unjustified given the long service and lack of opportunity to acquire qualification. The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the termination orders, and directed the respondents to reinstate the petitioners with continuity of service and all consequential benefits, including pensionary benefits, within four weeks. The court also directed that the petitioners be treated as having been in continuous service for all purposes.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination of Untrained Teachers - Long Continuous Service - Petitioners appointed as untrained primary teachers in 1992 and 2000, served without complaint for 20-28 years, terminated in 2020 solely for lack of D.Ed qualification - Court held that termination without considering long service and without providing opportunity to acquire qualification is unsustainable - Held that the impugned termination orders are quashed and set aside (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as untrained primary teachers and served for 20-28 years, solely on the ground of not possessing D.Ed qualification, is legal and sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned termination orders dated 27/05/2020 are quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioners with continuity of service and all consequential benefits, including pensionary benefits, within four weeks. The petitioners shall be treated as having been in continuous service for all purposes.

Law Points

  • Termination of services of untrained teachers appointed prior to requirement of D.Ed qualification
  • long continuous service
  • no complaint
  • opportunity to acquire qualification
  • Rule 101 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules
  • 1982
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (10) 280

Writ Petition No. 5841/2024

2025-10-01

M.S. Jawalkar, Raj D. Wakode

2025:BHC-NAG:10353-DB

Shri S.K. Patil for Petitioners, Shri A.S. Fulzele Addl. GP for Respondent/State, Shri A.W. Paunikar for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3

Kaliram S/o Budhaji Usendi and Baburao Komti Usendi

State of Maharashtra, Zilla Parishad Gadchiroli, Education Officer (Primary) Zilla Parishad Gadchiroli

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging termination of services of untrained primary teachers.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of termination orders dated 27/05/2020 and reinstatement with continuity of service and all consequential benefits.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were terminated after 20-28 years of service solely for lack of D.Ed qualification, despite being appointed as untrained teachers when D.Ed holders were not available.

Previous Decisions

Representations of petitioners were rejected based on Rule 101 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 vide communication dated 04/01/2024.

Issues

Whether termination of services of petitioners after 20-28 years of continuous service without complaint is legal. Whether the ground of not possessing D.Ed qualification is sufficient to terminate services of teachers appointed as untrained.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they were appointed as untrained teachers due to non-availability of D.Ed holders from ST category and served without complaint for 20-28 years; termination is unjust. Respondents argued that petitioners did not acquire D.Ed qualification and their representations were rejected under Rule 101 of the Pension Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

Termination of services of employees who have served for a long period without any complaint, solely on the ground of lack of qualification that was not a requirement at the time of appointment, is unsustainable. The court must consider the length of service and the circumstances of appointment.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioners came to be appointed on 09/01/2000 and 01/12/1992 respectively by following the due process of law as Untrained Primary Teachers, as the D.Ed holder candidates were not made available from ST category. It appears that their services were terminated only on the ground that they have not acquired the requisite qualifications of D.Ed. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners relied on the judgment in Writ Petition No. 6143/2016 (Smt. Umabai W/o Ramkrishna Deshmukh vs. State of Maharashtra & others) wherein Aurangabad Bench of this Court, in Paragraph ...

Procedural History

Petitioners appointed in 1992 and 2000. Services terminated on 27/05/2020. Representations rejected on 04/01/2024. Writ petition filed in 2024. Heard and allowed on 01/10/2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982: Rule 101
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Untrained Primary Teachers Against Termination for Lack of D.Ed Qualification. Services terminated after 20-28 years of continuous employment without complaint; court holds that termination without considerin...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Daughter's Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for smothering a child set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.