Search Results for "Maharashtra Entertainment Duty Act"

134 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 134 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cheque Clearing Deficiency. Bank held liable for deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 due to negligence in presenting cheques within validity period, with compensation awarded for loss caused by expired cheques.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals filed by Canara Bank against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Awards Compensation to Victims of Meerut Fire Tragedy Due to State and Organizer Negligence. State and Organizers Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Deaths and Injuries from Fire at Victoria Park Exhibition Due to Failure to Obtain Permissions and Ensure Fire Safety.

The Supreme Court dealt with a writ petition filed by victims of a fire tragedy that occurred on April 10, 2006, at Victoria Park, Meerut, during the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Cancellation of FL-III Liquor License for Breach of Rules. Licensee failed to appear at hearing despite show cause notice, leading to confirmation of cancellation by Single Judge and Division Bench.

The appellant, Ramkishor S/o Nathulal Jaiswal, was the proprietor of M/s. J. B. Restaurant holding an FL-III license under the Bombay Foreign Liquor R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Foreign Nationals in NDPS Case — No Recovery from Petitioners, Only Co-accused Implicated. Petitioners not named in FIR and no contraband recovered from them, thus Section 37 NDPS Act bar not applicable.

The petitioners, foreign nationals from various countries including Tanzania, Iran, Gujarat, Mumbai, Tamil Nadu, and others, were implicated in a case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Outraging Modesty Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Credible Evidence. Complaint filed after 8 months without explanation for delay and with contradictory statements leads to quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

The petitioner, Dr. Prakash Kanhayalal Kankaria, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking qua...