Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Foreign Nationals in NDPS Case — No Recovery from Petitioners, Only Co-accused Implicated. Petitioners not named in FIR and no contraband recovered from them, thus Section 37 NDPS Act bar not applicable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, foreign nationals from various countries including Tanzania, Iran, Gujarat, Mumbai, Tamil Nadu, and others, were implicated in a case registered at Jamamkhed Police Station, Ahmednagar, for offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The FIR alleged that a commercial quantity of contraband was recovered from co-accused persons. The petitioners were not named in the FIR and no recovery was made from them. They filed Criminal Writ Petitions under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking anticipatory bail. The State opposed the bail applications citing the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The court held that since the petitioners were not named in the FIR and no recovery was effected from them, the rigours of Section 37 NDPS Act were not attracted. The court granted anticipatory bail to all petitioners subject to conditions including furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 each, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving India without court permission.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 438 - Anticipatory Bail - NDPS Act - Section 37 - Foreign nationals accused of offences under NDPS Act sought anticipatory bail - No recovery of contraband from petitioners - Petitioners not named in FIR - Held that bar under Section 37 NDPS Act does not apply when there is no recovery from the accused and they are not named in the FIR - Petitioners granted anticipatory bail on conditions (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether foreign nationals accused of offences under the NDPS Act are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC when no recovery is made from them and they are not named in the FIR.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petitions and granted anticipatory bail to all petitioners subject to conditions: each petitioner to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety; they shall not tamper with evidence or influence witnesses; they shall not leave India without prior permission of the trial court; they shall attend the police station as and when required.

Law Points

  • Anticipatory bail
  • NDPS Act
  • Section 37
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Foreign nationals
  • Commercial quantity
  • Prima facie case
  • Custodial interrogation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (08) 9

Criminal Writ Petition No. 548 of 2020 with Criminal Writ Petition No. 554 of 2020

2020-08-21

Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jamahagirdar for petitioners, Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, APP for respondent/State

Konan Kodio Ganstone & Ors.

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petitions seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in connection with offences under the NDPS Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought anticipatory bail to avoid arrest in connection with a case registered at Jamamkhed Police Station for NDPS offences.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were implicated in a case where commercial quantity of contraband was recovered from co-accused, but no recovery was made from them and they were not named in the FIR.

Issues

Whether the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies to the petitioners when no recovery is made from them and they are not named in the FIR. Whether foreign nationals are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in NDPS cases.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they were not named in the FIR and no recovery was made from them, hence Section 37 NDPS Act does not bar anticipatory bail. State opposed bail citing the stringent provisions of Section 37 NDPS Act and the commercial quantity involved.

Ratio Decidendi

The bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act does not apply to persons who are not named in the FIR and from whom no recovery of contraband is made. Such persons are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners are not named in the FIR and no recovery is made from them. The bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act is not attracted in the present case.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petitions under Section 438 CrPC before the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking anticipatory bail. The court heard the matter and passed the order on 21 August 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: Section 37
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 438
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony. State Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 302/34 IPC and Section 2...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Foreign Nationals in NDPS Case — No Recovery from Petitioners, Only Co-accused Implicated. Petitioners not named in FIR and no contraband recovered from them, thus Section 37 NDPS Act bar not applicable...