Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules"

81 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retrospective Demand of Market Fee and DPC Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Market Committee Cannot Levy Fee on Transactions Prior to Notification of Market Area Under Sections 26 and 27 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

29 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Arasa Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Agricultural Produce Market Committee Against Recovery Order. Recovery of Excess Payment Without Imposing Penalty Not Appealable Under Rule 104 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Rules, 1967.

3 Aug 2016

The petitioner, the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Hinganghat, challenged an order dated 10-12-2008 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Refusal to Register Hamals as Members. Court upholds Registrar's order that hamals working in Agricultural Produce Market Committee are not entitled to membership under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 as they are not 'agriculturists' or 'persons dealing with agricultural produce'.

2 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Rajendra Tikaram Bagmare, a hamal (porter) working at the Agricultural Produce Market Committee in Yavatmal, filed a writ petition und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Service Matter, Holding Suspension Pending Enquiry Not a Punishment. The court restored the order of removal from service, setting aside the reinstatement ordered by the appellate authorities under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Rules, 1967.

4 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Agriculture Produce Market Committee, challenged the orders of the Divisional Joint Registrar and the Minister for Cooperation, Market...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

9 Oct 2014

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Chairman's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Agriculture Produce Market Committee Case — Notice of Motion Held Valid Despite Absence of Some Directors' Signatures. Court Declines to Interfere with Statutory Proceedings Under Section 14(4) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, Directs Petitioner to Raise Objections Before Presiding Officer.

12 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, was the Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol. He filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Chairman of APMC Katol for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Notice Issued on 02.12.2013 for Meeting on 12.12.2013 Held Invalid as It Did Not Provide 15 Clear Days' Notice as Required by Rule 14(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967.

12 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Katol, challenged a notice dated 02.12.2013 issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Agriculture Produce Market Committee Against Labour Court Order Granting Benefits Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act — Held That Computation of Benefits Under Section 33C(2) Cannot Be Based on Prior Adjudication of Entitlement Which Was Not Finally Decided.

28 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Gondia, challenged the judgment and order dated 15/11/2010 passed by the Labour Court in Referen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Eligibility to Contest APMC Election Despite Election Being Held, Holds That Deletion of Rule 88 Does Not Bar Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226. The Court set aside the order declaring respondent no.2 eligible to contest the election and directed rejection of his nomination papers, as the alternate remedy of election petition under Rule 88 of the APMC Rules was deleted.

23 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Sadashivrao Ganpatrao Mahajan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagp...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)