Search Results for "MHADA land"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "MHADA land"

280 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 280 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal of Society Members in Cooperative Redevelopment Dispute. Refusal of Interim Relief by Cooperative Court Not Perverse; Summary Eviction Order Under Section 95A of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 Upheld After Compliance With Natural Justice.

8 Aug 2011

The appellants, eight members of Goregaon Unnati Cooperative Housing Society, residing in chawls numbered 19, 20, 21 and 24, filed a dispute before th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Allotment of Land to Judges' Cooperative Housing Society. Allotment of land by MHADA to a cooperative housing society formed by judges was held to be legal and not arbitrary.

29 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Ketan Tirodkar, a citizen of India, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the allotment of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Succession Dispute Over Tenanted Premises — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred by MHADA Act. The court held that a suit for declaration of inheritance rights under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, is maintainable before a Civil Court and is not barred by Section 183 of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

7 Aug 2013

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking a declaration that they are the heirs and legal representat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tender Cancellation and Re-Tender for Lease of Land for Hotel Development. MHADA's decision to cancel tender and invite fresh bids upheld as valid exercise of administrative discretion, not arbitrary or mala fide.

17 Oct 2005

The Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board (MHADA) owned a plot of land in Powai, Mumbai, and invited tenders in November 2004 for a 90-year lease ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Legality of Orders under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Applicability of Repeal Act, 1999. Petition Seeks Quashing of Settlement, Notification, and Possession Orders Based on Erroneous Computation of Excess Land and Abatement of Proceedings.

13 Feb 2019

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MHADA's Refusal to Register Proposed Cooperative Housing Society Under Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976 — Held That a Proposed Society Is Entitled to Seek Registration and the Authority Cannot Refuse on Grounds of Non-Completion of Construction.

26 Mar 2015

The petitioners, Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society (proposed) and its promoters, along with Darshan Developers, filed a wr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MHADA Redevelopment Case Upholding High Court's Decision on Writ Petition Maintainability. Court Finds No Interference with Contractual Rights as Agreements Were Unregistered and MHADA Had Authority Under Regulation 33(9) of Development Control and Promotion Regulations, 2034 to Issue E-Tender for Private Land Redevelopment.

16 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from an e-tender issued by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) for the redevelopment of a privately owned...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

26 Nov 2015

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MBRRB Notices and Order in Bhendi Bazar Redevelopment Project. Court upholds validity of notices under Section 95A of MHAD Act and order appointing SBUT as developer, finding no violation of natural justice or statutory provisions.

2 Jul 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by occupants of Sardharia Building in Bhendi Bazar, Mumbai, challenging actions of the Bombay Building ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)