Search Results for "Karnataka Forest Act 1963"

114 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Section 104-A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 set aside as prosecution failed to prove illegal transportation of sandalwood beyond reasonable doubt.

The petitioners, four individuals, were convicted by the Trial Court (Civil Judge and JMFC, Bhadravathi) in C.C. No. 5462/2006 for an offence under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Identification and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 104-A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 set aside as prosecution failed to prove identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The petitioners, Asim @ Asham, Dadapeer, and Muruga, were convicted by the Trial Court for an offence punishable under Section 104-A of the Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Amendments to Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Deletion of 'Trader' from Section 72 and Insertion of Rule 76-A are Unconstitutional.

The present proceedings comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.

These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...