Search Results for "KIADB Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "KIADB Act"

221 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 221 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Resolves Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for 'Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout'. The Petitioners Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Issued by Bangalore Development Authority.

11 Jul 2014

A large batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Revenue Authorities to Process Phodi Applications Without NOC from KIADB for Land Granted in 1939-40. The court held that KIADB has no jurisdiction over grants made prior to its establishment, and thus authorities cannot insist on NOC from KIADB for phodi.

21 Nov 2024

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of 5 acres of land in Sy.No.1 of M.Satyawara Village, Sulibele Hobli, Hoskote Taluk, Bangalore Rural District, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Board's Appeal in Land Acquisition Dispute — Directs Payment of Allotment Rate Instead of Development Cost. The court held that the Board's policy of charging allotment rate for industrial plots is valid and the writ court erred in directing payment of development cost.

25 Oct 2013

The Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (Board) appealed against the order of a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.24701-702/2012, which directed...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Consent Award in Land Acquisition Case — Appellant Bound by Voluntary Agreement Under Section 29(2) of KIAD Act, 1966. The court held that a statutory agreement under Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, once voluntarily entered into, bars the landowner from seeking enhancement of compensation through a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

10 Jan 2020

The appellant, Rangaswamy B M, was the owner of land acquired under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (KIAD Act). A consent award w...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KIADB's Challenge to Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Reference Cases — Board's Delay and Lack of Merit Lead to Dismissal. The Court held that the Board's writ petitions were liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches and also on merits as the Reference Court's assessment of market value was not perverse.

20 Nov 2018

The Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.

11 Jul 2014

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Against Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout; Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Under BDA Act, 1976.

11 Jul 2014

Multiple writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition of Allottee in KIADB Act Case — Condition Requiring Prior Permission for Share Transfer Declared Ultra Vires. The Court held that the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board cannot impose restrictions on transfer of shares of an allottee company as such power is not conferred by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

12 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Kamalalayaa Real Estates LLP, a limited liability partnership firm, was allotted land by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Developme...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Due to Non-Compliance with Section 28(1) of KIAD Act, 1966. Acquisition of Petitioners' Lands Held Void for Failure to Publish Preliminary Notification in Two Local Newspapers as Mandated by Section 28(1) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

10 Feb 2023

The petitioners, owners of lands in question, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of thei...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notification Under KIAD Act Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner's challenge to preliminary notification issued in 2009 dismissed as writ petition filed in 2022 is grossly delayed without explanation.

17 Jan 2024

The petitioner, H.S. Abdul Riyaz Basha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Ben...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)