Search Results for "Interim Directions"

4544 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4544 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection to Petitioners in Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Exclusive Rights to Manufacture Ice Cream Under 'Vadilal' Brand in Designated Territories Preserved Pending Arbitration Arising from 1993 Family Settlement.

Shailesh R. Gandhi, Bela S. Gandhi, and Vadilal Dairy International Limited (formerly Super Milk Makers Private Limited) filed a petition under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Appoint Court Receiver Under Section 17 of Arbitration Act. Court Receiver is an Officer of the High Court Subject Only to Chief Justice's Supervision.

The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay filed a Report seeking directions on whether the Registry should accept matters where an Arbitral Tribunal appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Order of Asset Disclosure and Injunction in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds disclosure direction but modifies injunction to apply only to assets sufficient to secure the claim amount.

The case involves a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Manish Khera and another (petitioners) challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Interim Compensation Order Under Section 143A of NI Act and Remands for Reconsideration — Section 311 CrPC Application Rejected as Not Maintainable

The petitioner, accused in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenged two orders passed by the II A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Interim Deposit Order. The Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Joint and Several Deposit of Rs.190 Crores and Restraint on Property Alienation.

The dispute arose from a Share Holders Agreement (SHA) dated 27 December 2012 and subsequent amendments between the Claimants (investors) and the Resp...