Bombay High Court Adjudicates Connected Writ Petitions Involving Charity Commissioner's Orders. The Court Considered Challenges to Orders Passed Under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act.
22 Apr 2024...
Search Results for "Interested Person"
4277 result(s) found
Found 4277 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for High-Speed Rail Project Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioners, Not Being Recorded Titleholders, Cannot Challenge Acquisition Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013.
24 Feb 2023The petitioners, Dilip Babubhai Shah and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the land acquisition proceedings initi...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for De-reservation of Land Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Within Ten Years Results in Lapse of Reservation. The court directed the State to notify de-reservation within one month, holding that the reservation lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
10 Oct 2019The petitioner, Bombay Salesian Society, a public trust engaged in educational and charitable activities, owned a plot of land admeasuring around 5000...
- 151
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Awards Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Deposit of Compensation in Government Account Not Equivalent to Payment or Deposit in Court.
16 Feb 2016The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging land acquisition awards under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners sought a ...
- 122
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications Under Section 24 of 2013 Act — Possession Taken and Compensation Paid Under 1894 Act Precludes Lapse. Acquisition of land for a cooperative housing society upheld as possession was taken and compensation paid before the 2013 Act came into force.
24 Jun 2015The petitioners, owners of land measuring 2 acres in Sy.No.7 and 1 acre in Sy.No.9 of Gubbalala village, Bangalore South Taluk, challenged the acquisi...
- 53
High Court
High Court Rejects Remand Request in Land Acquisition Enhancement Appeal — Acquiring Body's Failure to File Written Statement After Being Allowed to Participate Does Not Warrant Remand. The Court Relied on the Principle That Mere Technicalities Cannot Defeat the Ends of Justice When the Party Had Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses.
2 Feb 2016The first appeal was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, by the acquiring body, Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. ...
- 33
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Succession Matter — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Recall Witnesses for Cross-Examination. The Court held that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause for recall and that the trial court's discretion under the Goa Succession Act was not improperly exercised.
27 Jul 2021The present appeal arises from an order dated 20.11.2019 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, 'A' Court, Bicholim, in Special Inventory Proceeding No.1/2...
- 64
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Land Acquisition Reference Matter — Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Application Under Section 18(3)(b) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court held that the Land Acquisition Officer must forward the reference application to the civil court if the applicant is entitled to seek reference under Section 18(1) of the Act.
19 Sep 2025The petitioners, Sri Shrikant S/o Bhavu Desai and Smt. Hira W/o Bhavu Desai, filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Pr...
- 48
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Award Due to Unexplained Delay of 14 Years and Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner Claiming Tenancy Rights Failed to Seek Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
9 Feb 2024The petitioner, Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the land acquisition ...
- 119
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition; Sets Aside Order of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Rejecting Condonation of Delay Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act. Compensation for Land Acquisition Exempt under RFCTLARR Act Not Considered by Revenue; Matter Remanded for Fresh Decision.
8 Aug 2024The petitioner, the widow of the deceased assessee, sought condonation of delay in filing the income tax return for the assessment year 2022-23. Her h...
- 46
