Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for De-reservation of Land Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Within Ten Years Results in Lapse of Reservation. The court directed the State to notify de-reservation within one month, holding that the reservation lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 63
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Bombay Salesian Society, a public trust engaged in educational and charitable activities, owned a plot of land admeasuring around 5000 sq. mtrs. bearing FP No.454 in Nashik. The land was reserved for a bus terminus (site no.321) in the development plan under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act). The final development plan came into force on 26th June 2003. The acquiring authority, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), failed to acquire the land within ten years from that date. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State to notify the de-reservation of the land in the official gazette, as the reservation had lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act. The court examined the provisions of Section 127, which states that if land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within ten years from the date of the final development plan, the reservation lapses and the land is deemed to be released. The court found that the ten-year period expired on 26th June 2013, and no acquisition proceedings were initiated. The court rejected the respondents' argument that the period should be counted from the date of the earlier draft plan, holding that the relevant date is the final development plan. The court also noted that the MSRTC had not taken any steps to acquire the land. Consequently, the court allowed the petition and directed the State to notify the de-reservation within one month. The court clarified that upon such notification, the land would be available for the petitioner's use in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Lapse of Reservation - Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Failure to Acquire Within Ten Years - The petitioner's land was reserved for a bus terminus in the development plan. The acquiring authority failed to acquire the land within ten years from the date of the final development plan. The court held that the reservation lapsed and the land shall be deemed to be released from such reservation. The State was directed to notify the de-reservation in the official gazette within one month. (Paras 1-30)

B) Town Planning - Mandamus - Section 127 of MRTP Act - Duty of State to Notify De-reservation - Once the reservation lapses under Section 127, the State is obligated to notify the de-reservation. The court issued a writ of mandamus directing the State to notify the de-reservation within one month. (Paras 25-30)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation on the petitioner's land for a bus terminus under the MRTP Act has lapsed due to non-acquisition within ten years, and whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for de-reservation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and directed Respondent No.1 to notify in the official gazette within one month that the reservation for bus terminus on the petitioner's plot has lapsed. Upon such notification, the land shall be deemed to be released from reservation and available for the petitioner's use in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Lapse of reservation under Section 127 of MRTP Act
  • 1966
  • Failure to acquire within ten years
  • De-reservation of land
  • Right of owner to use land after lapse
  • Mandamus to notify de-reservation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019:BHC-AS:30217-DB

WRIT PETITION NO. 5347 OF 2018

2019-10-10

Akil Kureshi, S.J. Kathawalla

2019:BHC-AS:30217-DB

Dr. Virendra Tulzapurkar (Senior Advocate) instructed by Mr. Suneet Moholkar for Petitioner; Ms. Shruti Vyas for Respondent No.1; Mr. Murlidhar L. Patil for Respondent Nos.2 and 3; Mr. Nitesh Bhutekar for Respondent No.4

Bombay Salesian Society

The State of Maharashtra, Municipal Corporation of Nashik, Municipal Commissioner of Nashik, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus to direct State to notify de-reservation of land under MRTP Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing Respondent No.1 to notify in the official gazette that the reservation for bus terminus on the petitioner's plot has lapsed.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's land was reserved for a bus terminus in the development plan, but the acquiring authority failed to acquire it within ten years, causing the reservation to lapse under Section 127 of the MRTP Act.

Issues

Whether the reservation on the petitioner's land for a bus terminus has lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act due to non-acquisition within ten years from the date of the final development plan. Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the State to notify the de-reservation.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the final development plan came into force on 26th June 2003, and the ten-year period expired on 26th June 2013, without any acquisition, thus the reservation lapsed under Section 127. Respondents argued that the period should be counted from the date of the earlier draft plan, and that the reservation was still valid.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, if land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within ten years from the date of the final development plan, the reservation lapses and the land is deemed to be released. The State is obligated to notify the de-reservation. The relevant date for computing the ten-year period is the date of the final development plan, not the draft plan.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner – Bombay Salesian Society is a public trust formed and registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950... By the above Writ Petition, the Petitioner has sought the following reliefs... The court held that the reservation lapsed and the land shall be deemed to be released from such reservation.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay seeking a mandamus for de-reservation. The court reserved judgment on 7th August 2019 and pronounced it on 10th October 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 127
  • Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950:
  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949:
  • Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950: Section 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for De-reservation of Land Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Within Ten Years Results in Lapse of Reservation. The court directed the State to notify de-reservation within one month, holding that the reserva...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Rejecting Plaint in Suit for Injunction and Declaration — Dispute Over Common Passage in Residential Building. Court Holds That Disputed Passage Is Not an 'Open Space' Under MOFA Section 1A(e) and That ...