Search Results for "Indian Forest Act, 1927"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Indian Forest Act, 1927"

111 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 111 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Forest Department Orders in Charcoal Seizure Case — Directs Refund of Rs. 3,06,000 and Release of Seized Charcoal. Charcoal Produced from Non-Forest Land on Non-Agricultural Land Does Not Require Transit Pass Under Gujarat Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1978.

3 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Jaydeepsinh Dinbandhusinh Jadeja, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging two orders passed by the Forest Depa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Confiscation Order in M.P. Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act Case After Acquittal. Confiscation of Vehicle Under Section 11(5) is Unjustified When Criminal Charges Are Not Proved, as the Act Lacks a Non-Obstante Clause Ousting Jurisdiction of Criminal Courts.

4 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from the confiscation of a truck under the M.P. Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act, 2004, after the accused persons, including the tru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Seized Vehicle Pending Trial in Wildlife Protection Act Case - Magistrate Has Jurisdiction Under Section 451 CrPC. The court held that Section 50(4) of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 does not bar the Magistrate from releasing seized property under Section 451 CrPC, and the special provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 do not apply when seizure is under the Wildlife Protection Act.

21 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Sarika Nitin Salunkhe, is the owner of a truck bearing registration No. MH-09-EM-8479. On 26th October 2020, Forest Authorities interc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tree Preservation Act Case — Suit Not Barred by Section 28 as Act Not Applicable to Private Trees. Notices for compounding fees under the Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984 were invalid because the Act did not apply to trees on private land not covered by a notified area.

14 Jan 2021

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed Special Civil Suit No.18/1991/A in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bicholim, seeking a declarati...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows State's Revision in Wild Life Act Case — Deputy Range Forest Officer Empowered to Record Confessions Under Section 50(8) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Confessional Statement Recorded by Deputy Range Forest Officer Held Admissible as He is a Forest Officer Under Section 2(13A) of the Act.

22 Jun 2015

The State, through the Range Forest Officer, filed a Criminal Revision Application challenging the judgment and order dated 01/09/2014 passed by the l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation Order in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner's Wood Seized Without Proper Notice Under Section 61A of Indian Forest Act, 1927. Confiscation Proceedings Initiated Without Affording Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

14 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Namdeo Narayan Dekate, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing of an order dated 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975. Revisional Authority Cannot Reopen Final Acquisition of Land as Private Forest Under Section 18 of M.P.F. Act.

29 Mar 2006

The Petitioner, Feroz Shabbar Hussain, claiming to be the legal representative of the deceased original holder, filed a writ petition challenging an o...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Confiscation Appeal Order for Lack of Jurisdiction — Sessions Judge Not Competent to Hear Appeal Under Section 61(D) of Indian Forest Act, 1927 as Applicable to Goa. The appeal against confiscation of vehicle for carrying timber without transit pass must be heard by the District Judge, not the Sessions Judge.

29 Sep 2005

The petitioner, Pandurang Laxman Naik, owner and driver of a Canter Pick up vehicle bearing No. GA 02 T 5440, filed a criminal writ petition before th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Compensation Claim in Khoti Abolition Matter for Determination of Proprietary Rights. Holder of Khoti Tenure Must Establish Grant or Sanad to Overcome Presumption of Government Ownership Over Forest and Waste Lands Under Bombay Khoti Abolition Act, 1949.

15 Oct 1969

The dispute centered on the entitlement of the appellants, Shyamsunder Tikam Shet and another, to compensation under section 12 of the Bombay Khoti Ab...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Forest Department's Writ Petitions Against Acquittal in Forest Offence Cases. Court holds that prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of independent witnesses and procedural irregularities under Indian Forest Act, 1927.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves eight writ petitions filed by the Divisional Forest Officer and Range Forest Officer, Gondia, challenging the acquittal of responden...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)