Search Results for "Gujarat Tenancy Act"

194 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 194 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Appellants' claim of tenancy rights and adverse possession fails for lack of evidence and inconsistent pleadings.

The present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was filed by the unsuccessful defendants (appellants) against the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appellant's Letters Patent Appeals in Land Dispute, Upholding Single Judge's Order. Delay Condonation Denied as Unexplained; Appeals Found Devoid of Merit on Substance.

The judgment pertains to two Letters Patent Appeals filed by Vasharambhai Sagharambhai Bharvad against a common judgment and order dated 16.10.2025 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cancellation of Revenue Entry — Petitioner's Name to Continue in Revenue Records. Revisional Authority Failed to Consider Bona Fide Purchase Under Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

The petitioner, Sintex Power Limited, purchased agricultural land in Village Lunsapur, Taluka Jafrabad, District Amreli, Gujarat, comprising Survey No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Arrears Case — Tenant Failed to Pay Rent Despite Notice Under Section 12(2) of Bombay Rent Act. Eviction Decree Confirmed as Tenant's Default Attracts Section 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 29(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (the Rent Act)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Eviction Case Based on Bonafide Need Under C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949 — Reversing Appellate Court's Dismissal of Suit.

The petitioner, Tirathdas Pokhardas Kalda, aged about 83 years, is the owner of a house at Teen Nal square, Nagpur, which includes a shop block of abo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consent Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — No Fraud or Collusion Found in Consent Terms Filed by Counsel. Consent decree upheld as valid and binding under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The petitioners, Dhanaji Kashinath Shendkar and others, filed writ petitions challenging a consent decree passed in a suit for specific performance. T...