Search Results for "GCC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "GCC"

131 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 131 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Construction Contract Dispute. The court held that the arbitration clause covered the disputes and that the petitioner made out a prima facie case for interim protection under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Generic Engineering Construction and Projects Ltd., filed Commercial Arbitration Application No. 675 of 2025 under Section 11 of the A...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Challenging Return of Section 34 Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction — Holds That Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract and Prior Section 9 Filing at Salem Confer Jurisdiction on Salem Courts Under Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Apr 2026

The revision petitioner, Waterbury Farrel, a division of Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc., Canada, filed Arb.O.P.No.103 of 2019 before the Principa...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ of Mandamus, Directs Greater Chennai Corporation to Demolish Unauthorized School Lab Building. The Court held that once an unauthorized construction is sealed under Sections 56 and 57 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, the authority must complete enforcement by demolition.

11 Mar 2025

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Chennai Metro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal, Restores Arbitral Award in Contractor vs. Irrigation Corporation Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Award on Grounds Not Permitted Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by M/s. Shinde & Sons, a contractor, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Declines to Interfere in Tender Award for Ash Handling Plant; Holds Scope of Judicial Review Limited and Finds No Arbitrariness in Awarding Contract to Lowest Bidder Consortium Despite Office Memorandum Barring Chinese Companies.

2 Nov 2022

The writ petition was filed by Macawber Beekay Pvt. Ltd. challenging the notice inviting tender dated 24.06.2022 and the consequent letter of intent i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause in contract documents is sufficient to refer disputes to arbitration, and that the applicant's claims are not barred by limitation as the contract was not fully terminated.

4 Aug 2023

The applicant, Capacite Infraprojects Ltd, a construction company, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Dispute Due to Invalid Unilateral Appointment Clause. Clause 56 of the agreement providing for appointment of arbitrator by the Architect, an employee of the respondent, is invalid under Section 12(5) read with Schedule 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Dec 2022

The applicant, M/s. Kay Vee Enterprises, a construction company, entered into a contract with the respondent, Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of En...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor in Railway Contract Dispute — Rejects Challenge Based on Excepted Matters and Delay in Raising Counterclaim. The court found no ground to interfere under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the Arbitral Tribunal had considered the contractual provisions and extensions granted by consent.

14 Jan 2011

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Petitioner) against an Arbitral Award dated 16 December 2005 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in a...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award on Price Adjustment Claim. The Court held that the Commercial Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and interpreting contract clauses under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the arbitral award was based on material evidence and not patently illegal.

2 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a contract dated 09.07.2018 between the appellant, a contractor, and the respondent, the Deputy Commissioner of Dharwad Distric...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Upholds Commercial Court's Refusal to Set Aside Award Under Section 34 of A&C Act. The Court held that the challenge to the arbitral award on grounds of patent illegality and public policy failed as the arbitrator's interpretation of contract clauses was plausible and not perverse.

30 Jul 2025

The appellant, the State Project Director of Rashtriya Madhyamika Shikshana Abhiyana, invited tenders for construction of model schools and upgrading ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)