Search Results for "Family Court Jurisdiction"

10252 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10252 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Whether Small Cause Court is Subordinate to High Court on Original Side Under Section 41(b) of Specific Relief Act. Reference Arises from Appeals Against Rejection of Injunctions to Restrain Proceedings Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act in Small Causes Court.

The Bombay High Court constituted a Full Bench to answer a reference on the question of law: whether a Small Cause Court under the Presidency Small Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Constitutional Challenge to Article 19 of Decree No.35461 on Enforcement of Ecclesiastical Annulment Decrees. Petitions Seek to Nullify Canonical Marriage Annulments and Prevent Civil Endorsements, Questioning the Validity of Pre-Constitution Colonial Law.

Two writ petitions were heard together. In Writ Petition No.351 of 2017, the petitioner wife married the fourth respondent on 26 September 2009 under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lok Adalat Compromise Decree in Partition Suit: Third Party Not Permitted to Invoke Article 226 Against Lok Adalat Award. Writ Remedy Not Available to Strangers to Decree; Proper Recourse Is to File a Separate Suit for Declaration and Partition.

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by five individuals claiming to be members of the same family as t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Appointment of Receiver in Partition Suit. Notice of Motion Seeks Interim Relief for Joint Family Properties Allegedly Misappropriated by Co-Owners.

The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that he is entitled to a 1/10th share in the assets and properties of the joint family and for partition by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Compromise Decrees Passed Without Appointment of Representatives Under U.P. Court of Wards Act. Section 56 of the U.P. Court of Wards Act, 1912, Held to be Directory and Not Mandatory, Validating the Compromise Decrees.

The dispute arose from two cross-suits between the appellant, proprietor of Ganeshpur Estate, and the respondent, proprietor of Ramnagar Estate, conce...