Search Results for "Developer Termination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Developer Termination"

235 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 235 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Interim Measures in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act, Citing Public Interest in Airport Development. Termination of Determinable Contract Not Stayed as Injunction Would Amount to Specific Performance Barred Under Specific Relief Act.

23 Aug 2013

The case arose from a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favor regarding the cancellation of tender acceptance and forfeiture of earnest money.

20 Apr 2010

The appellant, Sunil Mantri Realty Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 29.09.2009 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Arbitration Application in Redevelopment Dispute — Tender Clause Not an Arbitration Agreement. Clause in Tender for redevelopment of Tenants Co-Operative Housing Society providing for settlement of disputes held not to be an arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Mar 2023

The applicant, Omkar Realtors & Developer Private Limited, filed a Commercial Arbitration Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order Terminating Arbitration for Lack of Arbitration Agreement. Developer Fails to Prove Existence of Arbitration Clause in Development Agreement with Cooperative Housing Society.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Panama Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Vacate Interim Injunction in Development Agreement Dispute. Plaintiff's Readiness and Willingness Not Shown to Be Lacking Due to Defendant's Own Conduct Under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC.

27 Mar 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed an application filed by defendant No.1A (Vivek Madhavlal Pittie) seeking vacation of an interim injunction granted on ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Unconscionable Delay. The Court upheld the termination of the development agreement under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, emphasizing that the right to shelter under Article 21 cannot be held hostage by a developer's inaction.

30 Jul 2024

The present appeal arises from a dispute concerning a slum rehabilitation project in Borivali, Mumbai, under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Interim Application in Redevelopment Dispute – Plaintiff Seeks Eviction of Remaining Occupants under Development Agreement. Court Addresses Whether Non-Cooperating Occupants Can Be Compelled to Vacate Pending Suit Where Majority Have Already Vacated.

16 Oct 2025

This matter arises from an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Ambit Life Style Homes LLP, in a suit for enforcement of a registered developme...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) Not Applicable When TDS Deducted and Paid Before Due Date of Filing Return Under Section 139(1). The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance, holding that the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) allows deduction if TDS is paid before the due date under Section 139(1).

28 Feb 2014

The case involves three appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Stamp Duty Order in Seawoods Project Development Agreement — Lease Deed Not Liable to Stamp Duty as Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. The court held that a development agreement-cum-lease deed executed by CIDCO for a 60-year term is a lease, not a conveyance, and is chargeable under Article 36 of Schedule I of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

28 Sep 2012

The petitioners, Larsen and Toubro Ltd and its subsidiary, challenged an order dated 16 July 2011 passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (r...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)