Search Results for "Deputy Tahsildar"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Deputy Tahsildar"

590 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 590 result(s)

Supreme Court

Court directed to be considered by the state within six months from the date of the order, granting the respondents the liberty to challenge the decision on the renewal application

10 May 2024

Lease agreement for a property in Orissa, initially granted in 1905 and renewed in 1944 for a period of 30 years. Following the expiration of the rene...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging Removal by No-Confidence Motion. Court holds that removal of a directly elected Sarpanch must be by Gram Sabha under Section 35(1)(b) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and not by Gram Panchayat members under Section 55(2).

10 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Jijabai Parasram Aatram, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Dhamandari, a seat reserved for Scheduled Tribe Woman. On ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Restoration of Land to Scheduled Tribe Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974. Transfer of Property by Non-Tribal to Another Non-Tribal Does Not Extinguish Right of Original Tribal Transferor.

10 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Smt. Leelabai Ashana Totawar and others, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal dated 18.01.2018, which dismissed t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Elected Sarpanch Challenging Orders Setting Aside Her Election — Estoppel by Conduct Bars Candidate Who Participated Without Objection from Challenging Election on Ground of Unauthorised Presiding Officer. The court held that a candidate who participates in an election meeting without objecting to the authority of the Presiding Officer cannot later challenge the election on that ground under Section 33(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

5 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Rukhmina Rajesh Dange, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Vyad, District Washim, on 9 August 2018, securing seven votes against...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation for Release of Land from Pada in Land Revenue Case. The court held that revenue authorities must consider representations for release of forfeited land within a reasonable time under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

22 Mar 2019

The petitioner, M.G. Suresh, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Tahsildar, Shiva...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Third Party's Writ Petition Seeking Cancellation of Caste Certificate Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner, not being the certificate holder or a statutory authority, cannot challenge the caste certificate of another under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

16 Feb 2017

The petitioner, Narayan V. Shiroor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad B...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Orders in Land Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Establish Title Over Disputed Property. The court held that the petitioner, having purchased sites after the initiation of proceedings, cannot claim ignorance and that the revenue authorities' orders were based on proper survey and demarcation.

4 Jun 2015

The petitioner, M/s Lakshmivan Polymers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging three ord...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Officials in Land Revenue Act Case — No Prima Facie Case for Abetment of Misappropriation. Section 192-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 requires specific allegations of abetment; mere official duty performance does not attract criminal liability.

17 Mar 2015

The judgment concerns four criminal petitions and a writ petition filed by government officials seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.18/2014 registered...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Restoring Fair Price Shop Licence in Absence of Notice to Complainant. Revision Filed by Licencee Allowed Without Hearing Complainant Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

26 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Shashikant Ghadge, along with other villagers, complained to the Tahsildar about mismanagement and irregularities by respondent No.5, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent findings of fact by trial and appellate courts cannot be interfered with under Article 227 unless perverse or without jurisdiction.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original defendant Shankar Mahada Kardile, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)