Karnataka High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation for Release of Land from Pada in Land Revenue Case. The court held that revenue authorities must consider representations for release of forfeited land within a reasonable time under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 35
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M.G. Suresh, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Tahsildar, Shivamogga Taluk (respondent No.2), to consider his representations for release of land from pada (forfeiture due to non-payment of taxes). The land in question was Sy.No.126/1 measuring 31 guntas situated at Mallapura Village, Haranahalli Hobli, Shivamogga Taluk, originally owned by the petitioner's grandfather Narappa. After Narappa's death, the land was mutated to the petitioner's father M.G. Shekarappa vide MR No.1/73-74. The petitioner claimed that the land had fallen pada due to non-payment of taxes and he had submitted representations on 21.03.1998, 18.01.2000, 07.02.2000, and 03.01.2012 seeking its release. However, the Tahsildar had not taken any action on these representations. The court noted that the representations were received in the office of the Tahsildar but remained undisposed. The court directed the Tahsildar to consider the representations and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt of the order. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Land Revenue - Release of Land from Pada - Duty of Revenue Authorities - The petitioner sought direction to the Tahsildar to consider his representations for release of land forfeited for non-payment of taxes - The High Court held that the Tahsildar must consider the representations in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within a stipulated time - The court directed the Tahsildar to consider the representations dated 21.03.1998, 18.01.2000, 07.02.2000, and 03.01.2012 and pass orders within three months (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tahsildar is obligated to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representations seeking release of land from pada (forfeiture for non-payment of taxes).

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent (Tahsildar) to consider the representations dated 21.03.1998, 18.01.2000, 07.02.2000, and 03.01.2012 made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt of the order.

Law Points

  • Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India
  • 1950
  • Duty of revenue authorities to consider representations
  • Land revenue administration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (03) 20

Writ Petition No.52600 of 2018 (KLR-RR/SUR)

2019-03-22

S.N. Satyanarayana

Sri P.N. Harish (for petitioner), Sri Venkatesh Dodderi (AGA for respondents)

M.G. Suresh

State of Karnataka, The Tahasildar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to revenue authority to consider representations for release of land from forfeiture.

Remedy Sought

Direction to the Tahsildar to consider the petitioner's representations for release of land from pada.

Filing Reason

Non-disposal of representations by the Tahsildar regarding release of land forfeited for non-payment of taxes.

Issues

Whether the Tahsildar is obligated to consider the petitioner's representations for release of land from pada.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that the land had fallen pada due to non-payment of taxes and representations were made but not considered. Respondents did not file any objection or counter.

Ratio Decidendi

Revenue authorities have a duty to consider representations made by citizens seeking release of land from forfeiture for non-payment of taxes and must pass orders within a reasonable time.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner herein is the grandson of one Narappa, the Original owner of land bearing Sy.No.126/1 measuring 31 guntas situated at Mallapura Village, Haranahalli Hobli, Shivamogga Taluk. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said land has fallen pada for non-payment of taxes. The 2nd respondent is directed to consider the representations made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt of this order.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru on an unspecified date. The petition came up for preliminary hearing on 22.03.2019, and the court disposed of it with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India, 1950: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation for Release of Land from Pada in Land Revenue Case. The court held that revenue authorities must consider representations for release of forfeited land within a reasonable time under t...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute — Widow's Absolute Ownership Under Section 14(1) Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Upheld. Property Received in Lieu of Maintenance Confers Full Estate, Not Limited Interest.