Search Results for "Confiscation Liability"

151 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 151 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Tribunal Order Quashing Penalty on Directors in Central Excise Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Evidence of Personal Involvement Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Aurangabad, filed a Writ Petition challenging the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Release of Seized Minerals in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Failed to Establish Ownership and Transport Permits Were Invalid

The petitioner, a partner in Srinivasa Minerals Trading Company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Aurangabad Hears Letters Patent Appeal Against Dismissal of Review in Kulkarni Watan Land Regrant Case. Decides on Rights of Purchaser Versus Successors of Original Watandar Under Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act, 1950.

The dispute involved lands bearing Survey Nos. 135 and 144 at Jamda, Jalgaon, originally held as Kulkarni Watan. In 1944, the vendor Ramchandra Tembul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Detention Certificate and Setting Aside of Auction in Customs Detention Case — Auction Upheld as Goods Were Not Cleared Despite Court Orders and Had Already Been Auctioned by Warehousing Corporation.

The petitioners, M/s Santogen Silk Mills Ltd. and its shareholder, imported 41 second-hand Sulzer looms in March 1994. Prior to import, the customs de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Release of Sealed Factory Premises in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Comply with Supreme Court's Conditional Order. Interest Demand Under Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962 is Statutory and Automatic, No Separate Demand Required.

The petitioner, B.V. Jewels, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold and jewellery, operates an export processing unit in SEEPZ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Settlement Commission Order Allowing Exemption for Imported Ferrari Despite Temporary UK Registration. Temporary registration for transit purposes does not disqualify a vehicle from exemption under Notification 21/2002-CUS as 'new, not registered anywhere prior to importation'.

The case involves a challenge by the Commissioner of Customs (Import) against an order of the Settlement Commission under Section 127C(5) of the Custo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order and Show Cause Notice Under PMLA for Lack of Reasons. Show Cause Notice Under Section 8(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Must Contain Reasons for Belief of Offence Under Section 3 or Possession of Proceeds of Crime.

The petitioner, Brizo Reality Company Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking to quash a provisional attachment order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Customs Settlement Commission Under Sections 127A and 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 in Ten Writ Petitions. Whether Settlement Commission’s Authority Extends Beyond Short Levy Due to Misclassification to Cases Involving Fraud Is the Central Question.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard ten writ petitions together, all involving a common legal question concerning the jurisdiction of the Set...