Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act"

304 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 304 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32M Certificate Conclusive Proof of Ownership. Certificate issued under Section 32M of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is conclusive evidence of tenant's purchase and civil court cannot ignore it.

The appellant, Pushpalata Narayan Thorbole, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 1.4.2014 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Eviction Suit by Trust — Notice of Termination Held Invalid for Non-Compliance with Section 36(2) of Bombay Tenancy Act. Tenant's Right to Purchase Land Under Section 38 of the Act Not Extinguished Due to Invalid Notice.

The respondent, Shri Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, owned agricultural land measuring 28 acre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Dispute — Finds No Error in Revenue Authority's Order Based on Prior Civil Court Decree. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Petition Barred by Delay and Laches.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Laxman Shankar Bandgar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Latur, dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Orders in Tenancy Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that petitioners failed to prove personal cultivation and that tenants were entitled to purchase land under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Madhav Dashrath Vahadane and Nivrutti Dashrath Vahadane (petitioners) challenging orders passed u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Land Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse. The court held that concurrent findings of fact based on evidence cannot be interfered with under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the petitioners (heirs of the original plaintiff) challenging the concurrent findings of the lower courts i...