Search Results for "Article 116"

609 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 609 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Issues Directions on Criminalisation of Politics in Contempt Proceedings. The Court mandates political parties to publish reasons for selecting candidates with criminal antecedents and report compliance to the Election Commission.

The Supreme Court of India, in contempt petitions arising from its earlier judgment in Public Interest Foundation v. Union of India, addressed the gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Agricultural Land Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute. Landlord-Tenant Relationship Established Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948; Sale Deed Held Invalid as Tenant Was in Possession.

The petitioners, legal representatives of Maharudrappa Baslingappa Swami, filed a writ petition challenging the orders of the Agricultural Land Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Illegal Detention in Chapter Proceedings — Violation of D.K. Basu Guidelines. Petitioner awarded Rs. 25,000 for being detained over 24 hours without production before Magistrate in Chapter Proceeding No. 68/2005 under Section 107 of CrPC.

The petitioner, Balasaheb Sadanand Bhagat @ Bhakta, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking compensa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Against Police for Illegal Detention and Demanding Bribe. Court holds that arrest without following procedure and detention without production before Magistrate violates Article 21 and Section 57 CrPC.

The petitioners, Rafiq s/o Madar Gowli and Faruq s/o Madar Gowli, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Revokes Leave to Sue in Summary Suit for Goods Sold and Delivered Due to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause. Article 39 of the contract required all legal proceedings only in Calcutta High Court, ousting Bombay High Court's jurisdiction.

The Plaintiff, Pacific Refractories Ltd., filed a summary suit in the Bombay High Court against the Defendant, Stein Heurtey India Projects Pvt. Ltd.,...