Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Agricultural Land Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute. Landlord-Tenant Relationship Established Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948; Sale Deed Held Invalid as Tenant Was in Possession.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 117
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, legal representatives of Maharudrappa Baslingappa Swami, filed a writ petition challenging the orders of the Agricultural Land Tribunal, Deputy Collector, and Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal which declared the respondent-tenant as deemed purchaser of the land. The land in question was Survey No.116-A admeasuring 9 acres and 7 gunthas at Wadhone, Udgir. Maharudrappa purchased this land from Limbabai by registered sale deed dated 15.10.1968. However, the respondent Hareshwar (since deleted) and Dhondayya claimed to be tenants of the land. The Agricultural Land Tribunal in Case No.84/TNC/O/2 dated 26.6.1986 held that the respondents were tenants and became deemed purchasers under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. This order was confirmed by the Deputy Collector on 6.4.1987 and by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal on 16.6.1990. The petitioners contended that there was a Civil Court decree in their favour declaring their title and that the revenue proceedings were barred by res judicata. The High Court examined the provisions of the Act, particularly Sections 32-G, 32-M, 32-P, 32-R, and 43-1A to 43-1D, and held that the tenant's right to purchase the land is not affected by any sale by the landlord without notice to the tenant. The Civil Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit as the matter fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the revenue authorities under Section 85 of the Act. The Court also held that there is no limitation for filing an application under Section 32-G and that the principle of res judicata does not apply when the earlier decree was passed without jurisdiction. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed and the orders of the revenue authorities were upheld.

Headnote

A) Tenancy Law - Deemed Purchase - Sections 32-G, 32-M, 32-P, 32-R, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Tenant's right to purchase land - Where a tenant is in possession on the tillers' day, he becomes deemed purchaser of the land - The landlord's sale to a third party without notice to the tenant is void and does not affect the tenant's rights - The tenant can apply under Section 32-G for determination of purchase price - Held that the tenant's right to purchase is not lost by a subsequent sale by the landlord (Paras 8-10).

B) Tenancy Law - Bar of Civil Court Jurisdiction - Section 85, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain suits relating to matters which the revenue authorities are competent to decide - The validity of a sale deed in contravention of the Act is to be decided by the revenue authorities - Held that the Civil Court's decree is a nullity and cannot bind the revenue authorities (Paras 11-12).

C) Tenancy Law - Limitation for Application under Section 32-G - Section 32-G, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - The tenant can apply for determination of purchase price at any time after the tillers' day - There is no period of limitation prescribed for such application - Held that the application filed by the tenant in 1984 was within time (Para 13).

D) Tenancy Law - Res Judicata - Principle of res judicata does not apply to proceedings before revenue authorities when the earlier Civil Court decree was without jurisdiction - Held that the revenue authorities were not bound by the Civil Court's decree (Para 14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the sale deed executed by the landlord in favour of the petitioners' predecessor was valid when the tenant was in possession and had a right to purchase the land under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948; Whether the Civil Court had jurisdiction to decide the validity of the sale deed; Whether the revenue authorities correctly held that the tenant became deemed purchaser.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition dismissed. The orders of the Agricultural Land Tribunal, Deputy Collector, and Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal are upheld. The petitioners are directed to hand over possession of the land to the respondents within three months.

Law Points

  • Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act
  • 1948
  • Sections 4
  • 25
  • 32-G
  • 32-M
  • 32-P
  • 32-R
  • 43-1A
  • 43-1B
  • 43-1C
  • 43-1D
  • Jurisdiction of Civil Court barred under Section 85
  • Sale by landlord without notice to tenant is void
  • Tenant's right to purchase land
  • Limitation for application under Section 32-G
  • Res judicata in revenue proceedings.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (11) 17

Writ Petition No.2007 of 1991

2014-11-27

Ravindra V. Ghuge

Mr.G.N. Chincholkar for petitioners; Mr.S.V.Chandole with Mr.Ashwin V. Sakolkar h/f Mr.V.G. Sakolkar for respondents

Parvatibai w/o Maharudrappa Swami (since deceased) through LRs Kashinath S/o Maharudrappa Swami, Subash S/o Maharudrappa Swami, Vilas S/o Maharudrappa Swami, Sow. Lalitabai w/o Kashinath Mathapati, Sow. Shivkantabai w/o Virbhadrappa Swami

Hareshwar S/o Balsingappa Swami (deleted), Dhondayya S/o Balsingappa Swami

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging orders of revenue authorities declaring tenant as deemed purchaser under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the order of the Agricultural Land Tribunal dated 26.6.1986, confirmed by Deputy Collector on 6.4.1987 and Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal on 16.6.1990, and to stay the operation of those orders.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed that the revenue authorities erred in holding that the respondents were tenants and deemed purchasers, ignoring a Civil Court decree in their favour.

Previous Decisions

Agricultural Land Tribunal, Udgir in Case No.84/TNC/O/2 dated 26.6.1986 held respondents as tenants and deemed purchasers; Deputy Collector, Latur confirmed on 6.4.1987; Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Aurangabad confirmed on 16.6.1990.

Issues

Whether the sale deed executed by the landlord in favour of the petitioners' predecessor was valid when the tenant was in possession and had a right to purchase the land under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948? Whether the Civil Court had jurisdiction to decide the validity of the sale deed? Whether the revenue authorities correctly held that the tenant became deemed purchaser?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they had a Civil Court decree in their favour declaring their title and that the revenue proceedings were barred by res judicata. Respondents argued that they were tenants and became deemed purchasers under the Act, and the Civil Court had no jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

Under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, a tenant in possession on the tillers' day becomes a deemed purchaser of the land. Any sale by the landlord without notice to the tenant is void and does not affect the tenant's rights. The Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain suits relating to matters within the exclusive jurisdiction of revenue authorities under Section 85 of the Act. There is no limitation for filing an application under Section 32-G for determination of purchase price. The principle of res judicata does not apply when the earlier decree was passed without jurisdiction.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners are the legal representatives of Maharudrappa Baslingappa Swami. Maharudrappa Baslingappa Swami purchased land from Limbabai by registered sale deed dated 15.10.1968. The land purchased by Maharudrappa Baslingappa Swami falls in Survey No.116-A admeasuring 9 Acres and 7 gunthas situated at Wadhone, Tq. Udgir, District Latur.

Procedural History

The Agricultural Land Tribunal, Udgir passed order dated 26.6.1986 in Case No.84/TNC/O/2 declaring respondents as tenants and deemed purchasers. The petitioners appealed to the Deputy Collector, Latur who confirmed the order on 6.4.1987. Further appeal to the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Aurangabad was dismissed on 16.6.1990. The petitioners then filed the present writ petition on 26.7.1991, which was admitted and interim relief granted. The petition was finally heard and dismissed on 27.11.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948: 4, 25, 32-G, 32-M, 32-P, 32-R, 43-1A, 43-1B, 43-1C, 43-1D, 85
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Dispute Over Ownership of Open Land Between Two Cooperative Housing Societies. Court holds that disputed property is not part of plaintiff society's layout and...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partially Commutes Death Sentence in Gruesome Honor Killing Case. Appellant's death penalty reduced to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment without remission in a case involving the murder of his pregnant daughter.