Search Results for "Additional Tahsildar office"

860 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 860 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Subsequent FIR in Land Dispute — Abuse of Process Under Section 482 CrPC. Second FIR on identical allegations as earlier FIR quashed as not maintainable.

The applicant, Mohammad Hisham Osmani, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Land Revenue Case — Tahsildar's Order Under Section 140(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Restored. Single Judge Erred in Quashing Mutation Entry Without Considering Appellant's Right to Be Heard and Limitation for Challenge.

The appellant, Sunil Chajed, claimed to be the owner of land measuring 1 acre and 4.08 guntas bearing Sy.No.91/1A. The Tahsildar, Bengaluru East Taluk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Arch Allegedly Encroaching on Public Road — No Encroachment Found During Survey by Revenue Authorities. The court held that since the Tahsildar's survey revealed no encroachment, the writ of mandamus could not be granted.

The petitioner, S. Saranya, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandam...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Involving Rural Election Authorities and Agriculturist Petitioners. No Substantive Order or Legal Findings Are Provided in the Extract.

The provided judgment text consists of the opening pages of a hearing notice or order from the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicated a Group of 23 Writ Petitions Against Revenue Authorities. The petitions challenged recovery orders issued by Collectors and Tahsildars, but the substantive judgment content is not present in the extracted text.

The Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad heard a batch of 23 writ petitions filed by individuals against State revenue authorities. The petitions cha...