Search Results for "writ petition premature"

987 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 987 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging ESI Coverage for Sweet Shop Based on Disputed Employee Count. Court holds that ESI Corporation must determine coverage under Section 2(12) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 after proper inquiry and opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, M/s Anil Chat Bhandar, a proprietary concern engaged in preparing and selling sweets and snacks in Nagpur, challenged orders passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Dispute Reference Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Government's Satisfaction for Reference Not Open to Judicial Review on Merits.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. and Shangrila Food Products Ltd. challenging the order of reference ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Election Programme of Cooperative Sugar Factory on Ground of Premature Interference. Court Holds That Once Election Process Commences, Remedy Lies in Election Petition Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Not in Writ Petition.

The petitioners, members of a cooperative sugar factory (Respondent No.3), challenged the election programme for the society's committee, alleging irr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Entertainment Tax Exemption for IPL Matches — State Government's Policy Decision Not Interfered With. Policy Decision on Tax Exemption Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioner, a sitting Member of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the propriety of the decision...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Interim Order — No Willful Disobedience Established as Accused Complied with Order to Restore Water Connection Within Time Granted.

The complainant, Kishin T. Panjabi, filed a contempt petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010168012022_1

...