Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Election Programme of Cooperative Sugar Factory on Ground of Premature Interference. Court Holds That Once Election Process Commences, Remedy Lies in Election Petition Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Not in Writ Petition.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 17
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, members of a cooperative sugar factory (Respondent No.3), challenged the election programme for the society's committee, alleging irregularities in the preparation of the voter list. The society is a specified cooperative society under Section 73G of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act), and its elections are governed by Chapter XIA of the Act and the Maharashtra Specified Cooperative Societies (Elections to Committee) Rules, 1971. The petitioners made allegations against the Minister for Cooperation and the Chief Minister (Respondent Nos.4 and 5), but the court clarified that it would not examine factual controversies and would dispose of the petition purely on a question of law. The court noted that the election process had already commenced, with the preliminary voter list scheduled to be published on 23rd February 2012. The court held that once the election process has started, the court should not interfere with the election programme on factual grounds, as the appropriate remedy is to file an election petition under Section 91 of the MCS Act after the election is concluded. Accordingly, the court dismissed the petition and directed the election process to continue as per the schedule. The court also declined to issue notice to Respondent Nos.4 and 5, as their involvement was not necessary for deciding the legal issue.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Election of Specified Cooperative Society - Scope of Judicial Interference - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Chapter XIA and Section 91 - The Court held that once the election process has commenced, the Court should not interfere with the election programme on the basis of factual allegations regarding preparation of voter list, as the remedy lies in filing an election petition under Section 91 of the Act. The petition was disposed of purely on the question of law without examining factual controversies. (Paras 1-5)

B) Cooperative Law - Specified Cooperative Society - Election Programme - Validity - Maharashtra Specified Cooperative Societies (Elections to Committee) Rules, 1971 - The Court upheld the validity of the election programme for a cooperative sugar factory, directing the election process to continue as per the schedule, including publication of preliminary voter list on 23rd February 2012. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Court should interfere with the election programme of a specified cooperative society on the ground of alleged irregularities in preparation of voter list, especially when the election process has already commenced and alternative remedy of election petition is available.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is disposed of at the admission stage. Rule made returnable forthwith. The court declined to interfere with the election programme and directed the election process to continue as per schedule. No notice issued to Respondent Nos.4 and 5.

Law Points

  • Election process of specified cooperative societies governed by Chapter XIA of MCS Act
  • 1960 and Maharashtra Specified Cooperative Societies (Elections to Committee) Rules
  • 1971
  • Court's limited scope in election matters
  • No interference with election programme on factual allegations
  • Remedy of election petition available under Section 91 of MCS Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012:BHC-AS:4493

Writ Petition No.1404 of 2012

2012-02-22

G.S. Godbole

2012:BHC-AS:4493

P.K. Dhakephalkar (Senior Counsel) with S.S. Patwardhan and Ajay Magdum for Petitioners; P.S. Cardozo (AGP) for Respondent Nos.1 and 2; A.A. Kumbhakoni with Amit Borkar for Respondent No.3; Vijay Patil with Prashant Darandale for Respondent Nos.4 and 5

Ranjit Prabhakar Banne and Prakash Jagannath Nale

Collector of Kolhapur, District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Kolhapur, Sadashivrao Mandlik Kagal Taluka Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Harshavardhan Patil (Minister for Cooperation), Pruthviraj Chavan (Chief Minister, Maharashtra)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the election programme of a specified cooperative sugar factory.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to challenge the election programme and alleged irregularities in preparation of voter list.

Filing Reason

Alleged irregularities in the preparation of the voter list for the election of the committee of the cooperative sugar factory.

Previous Decisions

Notice was issued to Respondent Nos.1 to 3 only; no notice to Respondent Nos.4 and 5.

Issues

Whether the Court should interfere with the election programme of a specified cooperative society on the ground of alleged irregularities in preparation of voter list when the election process has already commenced. Whether the remedy of election petition under Section 91 of the MCS Act is an adequate alternative remedy.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners alleged irregularities in voter list preparation and made allegations against the Minister for Cooperation and Chief Minister. Respondents argued that the petition should be disposed of on legal question without examining factual controversies.

Ratio Decidendi

Once the election process has commenced, the court should not interfere with the election programme on the basis of factual allegations regarding preparation of voter list, as the remedy lies in filing an election petition under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the nature of controversy and the fact that a preliminary list of voters is to be published on 23rd February, 2012, this petition is being disposed off at the stage of admission itself. As I have made it clear that the petition will be disposed off purely on the basis of the question of law involved and no factual controversy will be looked into, it is not necessary to go into the allegations made against Respondent Nos.4 and 5.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in the High Court of Bombay. Notice was issued to Respondent Nos.1 to 3 on 15th February 2012. The court disposed of the petition at the admission stage on 22nd February 2012, without issuing notice to Respondent Nos.4 and 5.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: 73G, Chapter XIA, 91
  • Maharashtra Specified Cooperative Societies (Elections to Committee) Rules, 1971:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Holds Meeting Rules Apply to No Confidence Motion Meetings Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958; No Fresh Meeting Can Be Convened After Expiry of Seven Days on Basis of Illegal Motion. The court ruled that Rule 17...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Election Programme of Cooperative Sugar Factory on Ground of Premature Interference. Court Holds That Once Election Process Commences, Remedy Lies in Election Petition Under Section 91 of Maharashtra C...