Search Results for "revenue tribunal"

3317 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3317 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Notification Exempting Light Motor Vehicles and MSRTC Buses from Toll on Sion-Panvel Highway. Dispute Arises from Concession Agreement Where Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Exemptions Cause Substantial Daily Revenue Loss and Contradicts Terms of Agreement.

The dispute arose from a concession agreement for widening and maintaining an arterial highway from Mumbai to Panvel, awarded to M/s Sion Panvel Tollw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Petitioner Fails to Prove Will and Default in Rent Payment. The court held that the petitioner, claiming as a legatee under a will, must prove the will and the tenant's default; mere mutation entry does not confer ownership.

The petitioner, Subhash s/o Pandurang Bagal, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Aurangabad, dated 14th O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Deduction for Record Production Bonus and Other Expenditures in Income Tax Reference. Payment of record production bonus not hit by section 36(1)(ii) as it was not paid out of profits but as an incentive for extra labour.

This is an income tax reference at the instance of the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) against the assessee, M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Company Limit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Notification 14/2010-ST is Clarificatory for Service Tax on Drilling Rigs in Continental Shelf. Appeal Admitted on Questions of Territorial Applicability of Service Tax to Offshore Drilling Services Under Finance Act, 1994.

The appellant, M/s. Greatship (India) Ltd., entered into contracts with ONGC in February and May 2009 to provide offshore drilling services using hire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Refusing Mutation in Land Revenue Dispute — Petitioners' Title and Possession Upheld Despite Alleged Government Land. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Tahsildar Must Hear Parties Before Refusing Mutation Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act.

The petitioners, Smt. R. Suguna and Siddarth Sarnaik, purchased 8 acres of land in Sy.No.42 of Navarathna Agrahara, Jala Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk,...