Bombay High Court Allows Deduction for Record Production Bonus and Other Expenditures in Income Tax Reference. Payment of record production bonus not hit by section 36(1)(ii) as it was not paid out of profits but as an incentive for extra labour.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 63
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This is an income tax reference at the instance of the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) against the assessee, M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Company Limited, arising out of the order of the Income Tax Officer for the Assessment Year 1979-80 under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue referred six questions of law to the High Court concerning the allowability of various expenditures claimed by the assessee. The first question related to the payment of 'record production bonus' of Rs.12,83,946 to employees. The Income Tax Officer had disallowed this payment, but the court found that the bonus was paid at a flat rate of Rs.27 per employee as per long-standing practice to encourage extra labour, irrespective of profits. The court held that such payment was not a bonus out of profits and thus not hit by section 36(1)(ii), and was allowable as revenue expenditure. The second question concerned the payment of Rs.32 lacs to M.N. Dastur & Co. for preparing a feasibility report and travelling expenses of Rs.27,424. The court held these were allowable as revenue expenditure as they were incurred for business purposes. The third question was whether expenditure of Rs.18.81 lacs on fabrication of a cooler was capital expenditure; the court answered in the affirmative. The fourth question was whether the entire initial contribution to the superannuation fund was allowable in the assessment year; the court held it was. The fifth question was whether section 40(c) or section 40-A(5) applied to an employee-director; the court held it did. The sixth question concerned expenditure on diaries & calendars (Rs.43,341), brochure (Rs.1,668), film shows (Rs.10,000), and chairman's statement (Rs.2,06,750) and whether they were hit by section 37(3-A); the court held they were not, as they were not advertisement expenditure. The court answered all questions in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Record Production Bonus - Section 36(1)(ii) - Payment of Rs.12,83,946 as record production bonus to employees was not hit by section 36(1)(ii) as it was not a bonus paid out of profits but a payment made irrespective of profit, pursuant to long-standing practice to encourage extra labour. Held that such payment is allowable as revenue expenditure (Paras 3-4).

B) Income Tax - Revenue Expenditure - Feasibility Report - Payment of Rs.32 lacs to M.N. Dastur & Co. for preparing feasibility report and travelling expenses of Rs.27,424 were allowable as revenue expenditure as they were incurred for the purpose of business and not for acquiring a capital asset (Para 2).

C) Income Tax - Capital Expenditure - Fabrication of Cooler - Expenditure of Rs.18.81 lacs on fabrication of cooler was capital expenditure as it resulted in acquisition of an asset of enduring benefit (Para 2).

D) Income Tax - Superannuation Fund - Initial Contribution - Entire initial contribution to superannuation fund was allowable in Assessment Year 1979-80 as it was an allowable deduction under the Income Tax Act (Para 2).

E) Income Tax - Employee-Director - Section 40(c) or 40-A(5) - Provisions of section 40(c) or section 40-A(5) applied in the case of employee-director of assessee company (Para 2).

F) Income Tax - Advertisement Expenditure - Section 37(3-A) - Expenditure on diaries & calendars (Rs.43,341), brochure highlighting achievements (Rs.1,668), film shows (Rs.10,000), and publishing of chairman's statement (Rs.2,06,750) was not hit by section 37(3-A) as they were not in the nature of advertisement expenditure (Para 2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the following expenditures are allowable as deductions under the Income Tax Act, 1961: (1) record production bonus, (2) payment for feasibility report and travelling expenses, (3) fabrication of cooler, (4) initial contribution to superannuation fund, (5) applicability of section 40(c) or 40-A(5) to employee-director, (6) expenditure on diaries, brochures, film shows, and chairman's statement under section 37(3-A).

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court answered all six questions in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The reference was disposed of accordingly.

Law Points

  • Record production bonus not hit by section 36(1)(ii) as it is not a bonus paid out of profits
  • Feasibility report preparation fees allowable as revenue expenditure
  • Fabrication of cooler is capital expenditure
  • Initial contribution to superannuation fund allowable in full
  • Section 40(c) or 40-A(5) applies to employee-director
  • Expenditure on diaries
  • brochures
  • film shows
  • and chairman's statement not hit by section 37(3-A)
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (07) 133

Income Tax Reference No. 95 of 1988

2005-07-04

V. C. Daga, A. S. Aguiar

Mr. D. S. Chopra for Applicant, Mr. P. C. Tripathi with Mr. Dinesh Vyas, Sr. Advocate for Respondent

Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay City I, Bombay

M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Company Limited, Bombay

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Income tax reference by Revenue against order of Income Tax Officer for Assessment Year 1979-80.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought answers to questions of law regarding allowability of certain expenditures.

Filing Reason

Revenue disputed the allowability of various deductions claimed by the assessee.

Previous Decisions

Income Tax Officer disallowed certain expenditures; matter referred to High Court under section 256(1).

Issues

Whether payment of record production bonus of Rs.12,83,946 was hit by section 36(1)(ii)? Whether payment for feasibility report and travelling expenses was allowable as revenue expenditure? Whether expenditure on fabrication of cooler was capital expenditure? Whether entire initial contribution to superannuation fund was allowable in Assessment Year 1979-80? Whether provisions of section 40(c) or section 40-A(5) applied in case of employee-director? Whether expenditure on diaries, brochures, film shows, and chairman's statement was hit by section 37(3-A)?

Submissions/Arguments

Revenue argued that record production bonus was hit by section 36(1)(ii) as it was a bonus payment. Assessee argued that the bonus was not out of profits and was an incentive payment, thus allowable. Revenue argued that feasibility report payment was capital expenditure. Assessee argued it was revenue expenditure for business purposes. Revenue argued that fabrication of cooler was capital expenditure. Assessee argued it was revenue expenditure. Revenue argued that initial contribution to superannuation fund was not fully allowable. Assessee argued it was allowable. Revenue argued that section 40(c) or 40-A(5) applied to employee-director. Assessee argued it did not. Revenue argued that expenditure on diaries, brochures, film shows, and chairman's statement was hit by section 37(3-A). Assessee argued it was not advertisement expenditure.

Ratio Decidendi

Record production bonus paid irrespective of profits and as an incentive for extra labour is not a bonus out of profits and thus not hit by section 36(1)(ii). Payment for feasibility report is revenue expenditure. Fabrication of cooler is capital expenditure. Initial contribution to superannuation fund is allowable. Section 40(c) or 40-A(5) applies to employee-director. Expenditure on diaries, brochures, film shows, and chairman's statement is not advertisement expenditure under section 37(3-A).

Judgment Excerpts

This reference is at the instance of the Revenue- applicant, arising out of the order of the Income Tax Officer for the Assessment Year 1979-80, under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act (ITR for short), 1961. As to Question No. 1: This question relates to the payment of 'record production bonus' in the sum of Rs.12,83,946. It appears that the Income Tax Officer has disallowed the said payment, though; he, as a fact, found that the said amounts have been paid @ Rs.27/- per employee for giving record production, as per the long standing practice of the management so as to encourage and appreciate the extra labour put by the workers.

Procedural History

The Income Tax Officer passed an order for Assessment Year 1979-80 disallowing certain expenditures. The Revenue referred questions of law to the High Court under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court heard the reference and delivered judgment on 4th July 2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 36(1)(ii), 37(3-A), 40(c), 40-A(5), 256(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Employee in Voluntary Retirement Dispute — Employer Cannot Recover Excess Payment Without Opportunity of Hearing. Voluntary Retirement Application Deemed Accepted Under Rule 48 of CCS (Pension) Rule...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds State Government's Power to Revise Pay Scales Based on Expert Committee Recommendations in Service Law Dispute. The Court held that scaling down of pay scales of Assistant Engineers from Pay Band-3 to Pay Band-2 was valid and no...