Search Results for "public figure"

996 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 996 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of Contract for Supply of Electricity Meters. Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s Landis+Gyr Limited, a supplier of electricity meters, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Passes Order on Interim Plea Over Yes Bank Management Rights Claimed by Heirs of Ashok Kapur. Core Issue Involves Interpretation of Articles of Association Regarding Heritability of Co-founder's Defined Privileges Following His Death in 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks.

The judgment deals with a Notice of Motion taken out by the legal heirs of late Ashok Kapur, co-founder of Yes Bank, who perished in the November 2008...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Suit for Recovery of Port Trust Dues Under Major Port Trust Act, 1963. The Court Considered the Liability of an Importer, a Canalising Agent, and a Shipper for Wharfage and Demurrage Charges After Goods Remained Uncleared for Years and Were Auctioned.

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, a statutory corporation under the Major Port Trust Act, 1963, filed Suit No. 1533 of 1985 before the High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Bid in Mining Lease e-Auction, Orders Fresh Auction and Penalty. Supreme Court finds error in 140.10% bid to be a genuine mistake, mandates a fresh e-auction while imposing a Rs 3 crore penalty on appellant for lack of due care.

Granted leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Orissa, which dismissed the writ petition of the appellant who had mistakenly placed...