Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Provident Fund Demand — Taj Residency Held Separate Establishment Entitled to Infancy Benefit Under Section 16(1)(d) of EPF Act. The court held that the Taj Residency, Nasik was a newly established hotel with separate identity and not a branch of Hotel President, Mumbai, and thus entitled to infancy protection under Section 16(1)(d) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
11 Feb 2011The petitioners, Piem Hotels Limited and another, challenged an order of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) dated 31 March 1999, which he...
