Search Results for "discharge under Section 227"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "discharge under Section 227"

1595 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1595 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Constitutional Mandate for Timely Municipal Elections in BBMP. Amendment Act 17 of 2020 struck down as ultra vires Article 243-U of the Constitution.

4 Dec 2020

The case involved a public interest litigation filed by two corporators of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) seeking directions to conduct...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Sections 23(5) of Income Tax Act, 1922 and 297(2)(g) and 271(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Against Double Taxation and Article 14 Challenges. Registered Firm’s Appeal Dismissed; Provisions on Double Taxation of Firm and Partners and Penalty Classification Held Valid.

18 Nov 1969

The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by a registered firm and its partners challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Industrial Tribunal Order in Industrial Dispute Case — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction by Suo Motu Raising Preliminary Issue. Management's Application Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for Approval of Dismissal Was Pending; Tribunal Erred in Holding Domestic Enquiry Vitiated Without Adjudicating the Application.

9 Mar 2017

The petitioner, M/s Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. (KFIL), filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Information Commission Order Holding Patriarchal Tribunal as Public Authority Under RTI Act — Tribunal Not Substantially Financed by Government, Falls Outside Section 2(h) Definition. The court held that an ecclesiastical tribunal performing functions under Canon Law and Portuguese Civil Code is not a 'public authority' under Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, as it is not substantially financed by the government.

17 Aug 2023

The case involves a challenge by the Archbishop Patriarch of Goa, Daman & Diu, Most Rev. Fr. Filipe Neri Ferrao, represented through his Procurator Fr...

High Court

KAHC010168012022_1

3 Sep 2022

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition of POTA Detenus Seeking Release on Ground of Unlawful Detention. Court holds that detention under POTA is valid and habeas corpus cannot be used to challenge conditions of detention or seek bail.

30 Jan 2006

The petitioners, Saquib Abdul Hamid Nachan and others, filed a habeas corpus petition before the Bombay High Court seeking release from detention unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal Award Declaring Closure Illegal in Industrial Disputes Act Case — Re-employment and Backwages Granted to Retrenched Workmen. Closure of Factory Without Prior Permission Under Section 25-O of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal as Establishment Employed More Than 100 Workmen.

13 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Global Health Care Products, a registered partnership firm manufacturing toothpaste in Dapada, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, closed its fact...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Civil Revision Petition Against Trial Court's Failure to Consider Interim Injunction in SARFAESI Act Matter — Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

19 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Dr. Jaishith Jebakumar Manuel and Pon Manju Usha, filed a suit (O.S.No.118 of 2025) before the Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Quashing of FIR in Cross-Case Involving Assault and Wrongful Restraint - Limitation Period for Cognizance Commences from Date of Offence, Not Charge-Sheet Filing, Under Sections 468 and 469 CrPC, with Delay Condonable Under Section 473. Court Emphasizes That Negligence of Investigating Officer Should Not Benefit Accused, Especially in Cases of Cross-FIRs Arising from Same Incident.

9 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from cross-FIRs filed after an incident on 09.05.2011 involving the appellant-complainant and respondent-accused, an advocate. The a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Criminal Complaint Case — Remand for Compliance with Section 244 CrPC Set Aside. High Court erred in remanding matter for pre-charge evidence under Section 244 CrPC after charges were framed under Section 240 CrPC, as Section 244 applies only to warrant cases instituted on private complaint.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Neeraj Gupta, filed a criminal complaint against the respondents, Pardeep Kumar Bansal and others, alleging that on 12th April 2007, a ...

57 58 59 60 61

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)