Search Results for "confession statement"

962 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 962 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Reliance on Inadmissible Section 67 Statements. Conviction for Possession of Heroin Set Aside as Mandatory Safeguards Were Not Followed and Confessional Statements Were Inadmissible Under Tofan Singh.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals of Anwarkhan Jahilkhan Pathan and Firdoskhan Khurshidkhan Pathan against their conviction under the Narcotic Dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Pune Bomb Blasts Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Delay in Trial. Applicant Allegedly Supplied Firearms Not Used in Blasts; Court Relaxes Statutory Bar Under UAPA and MCOCA.

The applicant, Aslam Shabbir Sheikh @ Bunty Jagirdar, was arrested on 13th January 2013 in connection with C.R. No. 168 of 2012 (later re-registered a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sri Ramakrishna, was convicted by the Fast Track Court-V, Madhugiri in S.C. No. 67 of 2011 for offences punishable under Sections 302, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Weak Circumstantial Evidence — Last Seen Theory Found Unreliable and Uncorroborated. Conviction Set Aside as Chain of Circumstances Incomplete, Benefit of Doubt Given to Accused.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Sunita, who was convicted for the murder of Sushila. The case was based entirely on circumstantial evidence, p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Weak Testimony.

The appellant, Vinod Wasudeo Balpande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.208/2013 for the murder of Shankarr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife in Tyre Shop Assault Case. Evidence of Mother and Police Witness Found Credible; No Reason to Disbelieve Testimony Despite Lack of Independent Witnesses.

The appellant, Mohammed Subhamiya Farukh Shaikh, was convicted by the 6th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for the murder of his wife Shehnaz ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Tiger Poaching Case Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 — Accused Found to Be Financier and Key Link in Transnational Wildlife Trafficking.

The State of Maharashtra (Forest Department) filed an application under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking cancellation of ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Age Determination. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC set aside as victim's age not proved beyond reasonable doubt and medical evidence inconsistent with alleged rape.

The appellant, Manikanta @ Puli, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Chikkamagaluru, in Spl.C.(PCSOA) No.10/2017 for o...