Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife in Tyre Shop Assault Case. Evidence of Mother and Police Witness Found Credible; No Reason to Disbelieve Testimony Despite Lack of Independent Witnesses.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Mohammed Subhamiya Farukh Shaikh, was convicted by the 6th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for the murder of his wife Shehnaz Begam under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1000. The prosecution case was that the appellant and his wife had marital discord, and five months prior to the incident, the wife and children were living with her mother PW1. On 23rd March 2005, the appellant came to PW1's house and asked them to come to Govandi on 24th March for giving talaq (divorce). On 24th March 2005, PW1 and Shehnaz went to Padmanagar police chowky where a talaqnama was executed. While returning home, the appellant, armed with a sharp cutting weapon, approached them, abused Shehnaz, and when she ran into a tyre shop, he followed and assaulted her. PW1 went to bring police help (PW7 Chinchkar), but by the time they returned, the appellant had fled. Shehnaz was taken to Rajawadi Hospital where she died. The appellant was arrested and charged. The trial court convicted him. In appeal, the appellant argued that the evidence of PW1 was unreliable and that there were contradictions. The High Court examined the evidence and found PW1's testimony to be consistent and credible, corroborated by PW7 who saw the injured woman and the tyre shop. The medical evidence supported the injuries. The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and dismissed the appeal, confirming the conviction and sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on eyewitness testimony - Appeal against conviction for murder of wife - Court held that the testimony of PW1 (mother of deceased) was credible and corroborated by PW7 (police head constable) and medical evidence - No reason to disbelieve the eyewitness account despite absence of independent witnesses - Appeal dismissed (Paras 1-25).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant for murder under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on the testimony of PW1 (mother of deceased) and PW7 (police head constable) and other circumstantial evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Credibility of Witnesses
  • Last Seen Theory
  • Motive
  • Section 302 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (04) 53

Criminal Appeal No.462 of 2008

2013-04-05

Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, P.D. Kode

Ms. Sarojini Upadhyay (for appellant), Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh (A.P.P. for State)

Mohammed Subhamiya Farukh Shaikh

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of his wife and sentenced to life imprisonment

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant on 28th September 2006

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence of PW1 and PW7

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that PW1's testimony was unreliable and contradictory; State argued that evidence was credible and corroborated

Ratio Decidendi

The testimony of an eyewitness, if credible and corroborated by other evidence, is sufficient to sustain a conviction for murder even in the absence of independent witnesses.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant assails the judgment and order dated 28th September, 2006 passed by the learned 6th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai convicting him for committing murder of wife and sentencing to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.1000/-

Procedural History

Trial court convicted appellant on 28th September 2006; appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.462 of 2008 in Bombay High Court; appeal heard and dismissed on 5th April 2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife in Tyre Shop Assault Case. Evidence of Mother and Police Witness Found Credible; No Reason to Disbelieve Testimony Despite Lack of Independent Witnesses.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Double Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Dog Tracking and Motive Evidence Held Inadequate to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.