KAHC010142892018_1
8 Dec 2025These cross-appeals arose from the Judgment and Award dated 19.01.2018 in MVC No. 758/2015 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mysuru. The ...
Search Results for "Section 160 Evidence Act"
866 result(s) found
Found 866 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Constitutional Challenge to Article 19 of Decree No.35461 on Enforcement of Ecclesiastical Annulment Decrees. Petitions Seek to Nullify Canonical Marriage Annulments and Prevent Civil Endorsements, Questioning the Validity of Pre-Constitution Colonial Law.
15 Oct 2019Two writ petitions were heard together. In Writ Petition No.351 of 2017, the petitioner wife married the fourth respondent on 26 September 2009 under ...
- 48
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Appeal Challenging Reference Court's Compensation Award to Legal Heirs in Land Acquisition Dispute. The Appellate Court Examines Res Judicata Plea from Earlier Eviction Suit and the Applicability of Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
22 Jun 2017This first appeal arose from a dispute over the apportionment of compensation for an acquired house in Goa. The appellant, Shantabai L. Parkar, claime...
- 50
High Court
High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be imposed for mere disallowance of claim without finding of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars.
21 Jun 2018The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 29.12.2016, w...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Award Reinstating Employee with Back Wages in Service Dispute for Non-Disclosure of Pending Criminal Case. Employee's Failure to Disclose Pending Prosecution Under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 in Attestation Form Held Not to Vitiate Appointment as Employer Failed to Prove Suppression Was Wilful or That Employee Was Convicted.
29 Nov 2019The case involves two writ petitions arising from an industrial dispute between an employee, Narendra Vitthalrao Tarsekar, and his employer, State Ban...
- 234
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable as Vehicle Was Covered Under 'One Time Insurance' Scheme. Insurer's Contention That Long Term Act Only Policy Was Kept in Abeyance Rejected as Insurer Failed to Lead Evidence; RTO Record Proved Existence of Insurance Contract Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Paras 1-13).
16 Nov 2021The appeal arose from the judgment and award dated 28 March 2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nashik in MACP No. 288 of 2009. The app...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Daughter Claiming Prior Partition, Upholds Sale Deed Executed by Widow in Favour of Other Daughter. Widow's Absolute Ownership Under Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Validly Transferred Title to Purchaser Daughter.
24 Jul 2012The dispute concerns agricultural land and a house originally owned by Eknath, who died in 1953 leaving behind his widow Salubai and two daughters, Ch...
- 95
High Court
High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in Land Dispute Under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 -- Petitioners Challenge Unilateral Grant to Magnum Tower CHS Limited
24 Feb 2026The High Court of Bombay allowed a Writ Petition filed by Petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and others, challenging an order dated 9 Januar...
- 382
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Petition to Correct Eviction Decree Under Section 152 CPC — Decree Must Reflect Actual Area of Suit Property as Found by Courts Below, Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree.
30 Apr 2021The petitioners, landlords and decree holders, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 12th J...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Prison Superintendent for Wilful Disobedience of Emergency Parole Orders. Superintendent Selectively Applied Binding Precedent Under Rule 19(1)(c) of Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 2020, Refusing Release to 35 Eligible Prisoners While Granting Parole to 6 Ineligible Ones.
16 Mar 2022The Bombay High Court at Nagpur initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Shri Anupkumar M. Kumre, Superintendent of Central Prison, Nagpur, und...
- 50
