Search Results for "separate suit maintainability"

784 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 784 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Consent Terms Binding on Successor Developer. Petitioners' Entitlement to Two Shops of 409 Sq Ft Each Upheld Based on Consent Terms in Suit No.1994 of 2008.

The petitioners, Alphonso D'Souza and Vanessa D'Souza, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 5th January 2022 passed by the Apex Grievances...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Company Law Board's Power to Direct Issue of Shares Under Section 111 of Companies Act, 1956. The appeal raises the question whether the Board can order issuance of share certificates and rectification of register absent valid transfer documents.

This company appeal arose from an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 14 January 2013 in Company Petition No. 23 of 2012. The CLB had directed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court's Dismissal of Writ Petition Challenging Departmental Action in Jail Break Case. Case Involves Escape of Four Under-Trials from Burail Jail Through a 94-Foot Tunnel, Leading to FIR and Enquiry Committee Report.

The case concerns the escape of four under-trial prisoners from Model Jail, Burail, Chandigarh, on the night of 21-22 January 2004. The prisoners esca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition by State-Owned Oil Corporation to Set Aside Arbitral Award. Petitioner Alleges That Award Is Vitiated by Fraud Due to Non-Disclosure of Corporate Insolvency Proceedings by Respondent Joint Venture.

The matter arose out of a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Challenging Illegal Construction by Builder with Political Connections. Court Quashes Regularisation Orders and Directs Demolition of Unauthorised Structures in Old Goa.

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the construction of buildings by Respo...