Search Results for "registry procedure"

1630 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1630 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Against Nashik Municipal Corporation for Non-Compliance with Government Resolution on Religious Structures. Court Directs Publication of List of Religious Shrines Before Demolition to Ensure Natural Justice Under Government Resolution dated 5/5/2011.

The petitioners, public-spirited residents of Nashik, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to the Nashik Municipal Corporation (respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Challenge to MPSC Procedural Rule on Wait-List in Judicial Service Recruitment. Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 Rule 6(3)(b) and Article 234 of the Constitution Examined.

The Bombay High Court Division Bench heard a batch of writ petitions filed by candidates who had applied for the post of Civil Judge Junior Division a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in NDPS Case: Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC After Conviction Is Impermissible. The power under Section 319 CrPC can be exercised only before the pronouncement of judgment; once the trial concludes and judgment is pronounced, the court becomes functus officio.

The Supreme Court of India heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had dismissed crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appeals Against Special Court Orders Outside Bench's Territorial Limits Lie Only to Principal Seat. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Location of Court, Not Place of Offence Under Chapter XXXI of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

The case involved a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad to determine the territorial jurisdiction for appeals against o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...