High Court of Karnataka Upholds Maintenance Order in Family Court Case — Service of Notice by Registered Post Deemed Sufficient Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The court held that service of notice by registered post in a maintenance petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is sufficient compliance, and the quantum of maintenance awarded by the Family Court was not interfered with.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shivashankar Chandrashekar Jotavar, challenged an order dated 23.12.2015 passed by the Family Court, Belagavi in Crl.Misc.No.456/2015, which awarded maintenance of Rs.5,000 per month to his wife (respondent no.1) and Rs.1,000 per month to each of his two minor children (respondent nos.2 and 3) until they attain majority. The petitioner contended that the notice issued by the Family Court was not served upon him properly, and therefore the ex parte order was bad in law. The High Court examined the issue of service of notice in proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) before the Family Court. The court noted that the Family Court had issued notice by registered post, which was returned with an endorsement 'refused'. The court held that service by registered post is sufficient compliance under the law, and the petitioner cannot claim that he was not served. On the quantum of maintenance, the court found that the amounts awarded were reasonable and did not warrant interference. Consequently, the revision petition was dismissed, and the order of the Family Court was upheld.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Maintenance - Section 125 Cr.P.C. - Service of Notice - The court considered whether service of notice by registered post in a maintenance petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is sufficient. The High Court held that service by registered post is sufficient compliance and the Family Court's order granting maintenance was upheld. (Paras 1-3)

B) Family Law - Maintenance - Quantum - Section 125 Cr.P.C. - The Family Court awarded Rs.5,000 per month to the wife and Rs.1,000 per month to each child. The High Court found no ground to interfere with the quantum of maintenance. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether service of notice by registered post issued by the Family Court in a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is sufficient compliance of law?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the revision petition and upheld the order of the Family Court dated 23.12.2015 in Crl.Misc.No.456/2015.

Law Points

  • Service of notice by registered post is sufficient compliance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in Family Court proceedings
  • Maintenance proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. are summary in nature
  • Family Courts Act
  • 1984 Section 19(4) provides for revision against orders of Family Court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (09) 5

RPFC No.100062/2016

2016-09-01

P.S. Dinesh Kumar

M G Naganuri

Shivashankar Chandrashekar Jotavar

Poornima W/o Shivashankar Jotavar, Kumarnandan S/o Shivashankar Jotavar, Kumari Sonam D/o Shivashankar Jotavar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Revision petition under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against an order of maintenance passed by the Family Court.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to set aside the order dated 23.12.2015 passed by the Family Court, Belagavi in Crl.Misc.No.456/2015.

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged the maintenance order on the ground that notice was not served upon him properly.

Previous Decisions

Family Court, Belagavi allowed Crl.Misc.No.456/2015 and awarded maintenance of Rs.5,000 per month to respondent no.1 and Rs.1,000 per month each to respondent nos.2 and 3.

Issues

Whether service of notice by registered post in a maintenance petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is sufficient compliance of law?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that notice was not served upon him properly, and therefore the ex parte order was bad in law.

Ratio Decidendi

Service of notice by registered post in proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. before the Family Court is sufficient compliance of law, and the quantum of maintenance awarded by the Family Court is reasonable and does not warrant interference.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition raises an important question with regard to service of notice/s issued by the Family Courts in petitions filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. for maintenance. Petitioner herein has challenged the order dated 23.12.2015 allowing Crl.Misc.No.456/2015 by the Family Court, Belagavi and awarding maintenance of Rs.5,000/- per month to the 1st respondent and Rs.1,000/- per month to the 2nd respondent till he attained majority and Rs.1,000/- per month to the 3rd respondent.

Procedural History

The Family Court, Belagavi passed an order on 23.12.2015 in Crl.Misc.No.456/2015 awarding maintenance. The petitioner filed a revision petition under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, which was dismissed on 01.09.2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Family Courts Act, 1984: 19(4)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 125
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Upholds Maintenance Order in Family Court Case — Service of Notice by Registered Post Deemed Sufficient Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The court held that service of notice by registered post in a maintenance petition under Secti...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Plaintiff Not Entitled to Protection Under Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act for Want of Readiness and Willingness. The court upheld the concurrent findings that the plaintiff fa...