Search Results for "reference under Industrial Disputes Act"

1785 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1785 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Bar Bodies and Advocate, Holding Advocates Not Liable Under Consumer Protection Act. Legal Profession is Sui Generis and Excluded from Definition of 'Service' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986/2019.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which held that c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Official Liquidator to Adjudicate Workmen's Claims in Winding Up of KMA Ltd. Under Sections 529A and 530 of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the Official Liquidator must consider the Industrial Court's order dated 2 July 2005 in adjudicating claims of workmen.

The judgment concerns two company applications filed in the winding up proceedings of KMA Ltd. (in liquidation). Company Application No. 593 of 2011 w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against MSME Facilitation Council Award on Maintainability Grounds. Council Has Jurisdiction Over Disputes Arising Before 2006 Act Came Into Effect.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged an award of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (respondent no. 4) in a writ petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Hears Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. The Court Examines Whether Trial Court Erred in Denying Interim Protection Despite Registered Device Mark and Alleged Joint Use of the 'Kshetrapal' Mark.

The dispute centered on the use of the trademark 'Shree Kshetrapal' / 'Kshetrapal Construction' by two individuals in the construction business in Guj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act Based on Lok Adalat Award. Lok Adalat Award Not an Award of Court Under Part III of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners' land was acquired by the State for a storage lake along with other lands. An award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894...