Search Results for "ownership basis"

3375 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3375 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 383 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Bifurcation of Interest and Service Charges. Tribunal's finding that no service tax liability arises prior to 01.03.2006 due to absence of mechanism for bifurcation of value of service from interest amount upheld.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the order of the Cust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals Against Execution of Decree for Possession, Holding That Objectors Claiming Adverse Possession Must First Establish Their Own Independent Title. Order XXI Rule 97 CPC Objections Cannot Be Used to Re-litigate Title Already Decided Against the Judgment Debtor.

The present appeals arise from execution proceedings initiated by the decree holder (respondent No. 1) to enforce a decree for possession of land adme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Mesne Profits Claim in Ownership Dispute Over Flat. Court holds that plaintiffs established ownership of suit flat and defendants are liable to pay mesne profits for illegal occupation.

The plaintiffs, Mrs. Tarla N. Morjaria, Mrs. Usha S. Somana, and Mrs. Bharati V. Tanna, filed a suit against the defendants, Mr. Bipin Hiralal Shah an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Brothers, Remands Case for Fresh Consideration of Counterclaim. Court holds that a counterclaim for possession cannot be decreed without proper valuation and payment of court fees under the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

The appellant, original plaintiff Gujabrao, filed Special Civil Suit No.90/1993 for a permanent injunction against his brother Punjabrao (defendant No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Challenging Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Property Dispute. Court holds that appointment of arbitrator by consent of parties is valid and cannot be challenged under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment pertains to two arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioners in Arbitratio...