Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Held that where the deceased was a pillion rider on a motorcycle driven by a third party, the insurer of the offending vehicle is liable only to the extent of its insured's negligence, and contributory negligence must be apportioned.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of a deceased person who died in a road accident. The deceased was a pillion rider on a motorcycle driven by a third party. The motorcycle collided with a truck. The claimants sought compensation from the owner and insurer of the motorcycle. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 1,50,000 with interest, holding the insurer (appellant) liable. The insurer appealed, contending that the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence as he was riding as a pillion on a motorcycle driven by a person who was not insured by the appellant. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the deceased's own negligence contributed to the accident. The Court held that the principle of contributory negligence applies, and the liability must be apportioned. The Court reduced the compensation by 50% on account of the deceased's contributory negligence. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the award to Rs. 75,000 with interest.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Compensation - Contributory Negligence - Apportionment of Liability - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Sections 166, 168 - The deceased was a pillion rider on a motorcycle driven by a third party who was not insured by the appellant. The Tribunal held the appellant liable for the entire compensation as insurer of the offending vehicle. The High Court held that the deceased's own negligence contributed to the accident, and therefore liability must be apportioned. The insurer is liable only to the extent of the insured's negligence, not for the entire amount. (Paras 1-10)

B) Motor Accident Compensation - Quantum of Compensation - Deduction for Contributory Negligence - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 168 - The Court reduced the compensation amount by 50% on account of contributory negligence of the deceased. The multiplier and dependency calculation were otherwise upheld. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal erred in holding the appellant insurer liable for the entire compensation amount despite the contributory negligence of the deceased as a pillion rider on a motorcycle driven by a third party?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is reduced by 50% on account of contributory negligence of the deceased. The appellant is liable to pay Rs. 75,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization.

Law Points

  • Contributory negligence
  • Apportionment of liability
  • Motor accident compensation
  • Liability of insurer
  • Negligence of third party driver
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (12) 1

First Appeal No. 553 of 1996

0000-00-00

Shri. S.L. Kulkarni for Appellant

New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Kausalyabai Onkar Lahudkar and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Remedy Sought

Appellant insurer sought reduction of compensation on ground of contributory negligence of deceased.

Filing Reason

The Tribunal held the appellant liable for entire compensation despite contributory negligence of deceased.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 1,50,000 with interest against the appellant.

Issues

Whether the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence? Whether the insurer is liable for the entire compensation despite contributory negligence?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the deceased was a pillion rider on a motorcycle driven by a third party, and his own negligence contributed to the accident. Respondents argued that the deceased was not negligent and the accident was solely due to the truck driver's fault.

Ratio Decidendi

Where a deceased pillion rider contributed to the accident by his own negligence, the insurer of the offending vehicle is liable only to the extent of the insured's negligence, and compensation must be apportioned accordingly.

Judgment Excerpts

The deceased was a pillion rider on a motorcycle driven by a third party. The Tribunal erred in holding the appellant liable for the entire compensation. The deceased's own negligence contributed to the accident.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation. The insurer appealed to the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 166, 168
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Held that where the deceased was a pillion rider on a motorcycle driven by a third party, the insurer of ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Union of India and Government Presses Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award. Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Invalid Due to Existing Settlement Under Section 2(p) of the ...