KAHC010000842011_1
11 Jul 2014The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...
Search Results for "construction activity"
1624 result(s) found
Found 1624 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.
1 Jan 1970The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, considers landlord's writ petitions against appellate authority's rejection of eviction on bonafide need under the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. The dispute centers on whether the landlord established genuine requirement for the tenanted premises for family businesses and whether the appellate authority erred in overturning the Rent Controller's findings.
20 Jan 2006The dispute before the High Court arose out of three writ petitions filed by landlord Ismalibhai Gulam Hussain challenging the orders of the Additiona...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Batch of Petitions by Retailers and Others Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Immovable Property. The levy of service tax on renting was contested under the Finance Act, 1994, Sections 65–66, on constitutional grounds.
4 Aug 2011The judgment, delivered orally on August 4, 2011, by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court comprising Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and Anoop V. Mohta, JJ....
- 50
High Court
Gujarat High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice in GST Input Tax Credit Dispute — Misinterpretation of Section 17(5)(d) of CGST Act, 2017. Transfer of Leasehold Rights of Industrial Plots Held Not to Be 'Construction of Immovable Property' for ITC Reversal.
10 Feb 2026The petitioner, Niket Bipinbhai Patel, through his power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging a show-ca...
- 233
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Nursery Land. Market Value Determined Based on Potential for Development and Comparable Sales Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
30 Nov -0001The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellant, M/s. Vikas Nursery...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.
8 Dec 2016The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...
- 137
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Planned Development by YEIDA - Urgency Provisions Validly Invoked. The court held that the invocation of Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for acquisition of land for integrated development was justified and the landowners' right to hearing under Section 5-A was validly dispensed with.
26 Nov 2024The Supreme Court, in a batch of civil appeals, considered the validity of land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh throug...
- 649
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.
24 Aug 2020The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...
- 272
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals By Appellants. Against State Of Gujarat Ors. -- Holds Construction Equipment Not Motor Vehicles Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Exempts From Registration And Tax Under Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958
8 Jan 2026The Supreme Court examined whether various construction equipment used by cement manufacturers within their factory premises constitute 'motor vehicle...
- 894
