Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

2122 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2122 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging 47-Year-Delayed Gut Map Amendment Under Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. Power Under Section 31A Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time Despite Absence of Limitation; Amendment Creating New Road Held Not a Mere Clerical Correction.

6 Jul 2026

The Bombay High Court heard a writ petition challenging an order dated 14 August 2008 by the Superintendent of Land Records, Sangli, amending a Gut Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Recovery Officer's Confirmation of Private Sale. Court Holds That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Possession Delivered, Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages, Not in Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

29 Nov 2011

The petitioners, Shaikh Gulab Shaikh Ahmed and Ambadas Maruti Kale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Petition Against MSEDCL for Wrongful Tariff Categorization Under Electricity Act, 2003. Telecom Service Provider Cannot Be Classified as 'Commercial' for Electricity Tariff Purposes; MERC Must Determine Correct Category.

16 Apr 2024

The Petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a telecom service provider and a central public sector enterprise, filed a writ petition under Artic...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act — Leave Encashment Deduction Allowed Only on Actual Payment. Clause (f) is not arbitrary or violative of Article 14 as it serves a legitimate purpose of preventing abuse and ensuring employee welfare.

24 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the constitutional validity of clause (f) of Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was inserted b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes IPC Offences in Electricity Theft Case After Compounding Under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Dual Prosecution for Same Acts Not Permissible. The court held that once the offence under the special enactment (Electricity Act) is compounded, the IPC offences based on the same acts cannot be prosecuted, as the Electricity Act is a complete code and the compounding amounts to an election by the complainant.

9 Feb 2018

The applicant, Syed Yaqoob Syed Masood, a Taluka Agriculture Officer, filed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 0273/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 143(2) Notice Issued Beyond Time Limit in Income Tax Reassessment — Notice Issued After Expiry of Statutory Period Under Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Is Invalid.

23 Apr 2024

The petitioner, AMNS Khopoli Limited (formerly Uttam Galva Steels Limited), challenged a notice dated 31st May 2023 issued by the Assistant Commission...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in MVAT Case — Tribunal's Liberal Interpretation of Section 23(5) Upheld for Concessional Tax Rate on C Forms. The court held that the Tribunal was justified in allowing the respondent's claim for concessional rate of tax under Section 23(5) of the MVAT Act, 2002, even though the claim was not part of the original assessment order.

8 Sep 2022

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) challenging the judgment of the Maha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recalling Witness in Election Petition — No Power to Recall Witness After Cross-Examination Under CPC and Representation of the People Act, 1951. The court held that Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC does not permit recall of a witness for further cross-examination after discharge, and inherent powers under Section 151 CPC cannot be invoked to circumvent specific provisions.

30 Nov -0001

The case arises from an election petition filed by Ravindra Ramji Mundhe (petitioner) challenging the election of Avadhoot Anil Tatkare (respondent No...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

4 Feb 2015

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petitions Challenging Acquisition for Mumbai Metro Project — Procedural Compliance Under Section 11(1) of Metro Railways Act Upheld. The court held that the requirement of hearing before acquisition is directory and substantial compliance by public notice suffices for a public purpose project.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands for the Mumbai Metro Rail Project un...

56 57 58 59 60

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)