Search Results for "IPC 506"

1913 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1913 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Parents-in-Law in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove murder beyond reasonable doubt in absence of direct evidence and incomplete chain of circumstances.

The appellants, Sitaram Nana Sarvade and Rukmini Sitaram Sarvade, were convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the offence ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Teachers in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Sexual Intent. Allegations of Calling a Student for Talking to a Boy and Using Abusive Language Do Not Attract Offences Under POCSO Act or IPC Sections 305, 354D, 509.

The petitioners, a drawing teacher and a physical training teacher at SDM High School, Dharmastala, sought quashing of Crime No.7/2024 registered by D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Abetment of Suicide Case Against In-Laws Due to Lack of Proximate Cause. Allegations of cruelty and dowry demand not directly linked to suicide as deceased was living separately for years before the incident.

The applicants, who are the husband and in-laws of the deceased Aasma, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as death caused by septicemia from stab wound was not intentional, reducing offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

The appellant, Sangit s/o Rajaram Ingle, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, for the murder of Ganesh Ingale under Section 302 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR: Civil Dispute Misinterpreted as Criminal Offense. Justice prevails as the Court clarifies the distinction between civil and criminal liability.

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against applicants, emphasizing the civil nature of the dispute and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cross-FIR Case Between Advocates Due to Abuse of Process and Apology. Second FIR Registered as Counterblast to First FIR Was Deemed an Abuse of Law Under Sections 294(b), 323, and 506(1) of Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Quashed to End Protracted Litigation.

The appeal arose from a dispute between two advocates practising in Kodaikanal, leading to cross-FIRs registered in December 2017. The first appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder and Attempt to Murder Case Arising from Land Dispute. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 506(II) read with Section 149 IPC confirmed for active participants in fatal assault, while acquittal of other accused upheld for lack of evidence.

The case arises from a land dispute between two families in Dhol Umari, Hingoli. On 18th May 2014, the informant Dipak Khandare and his family members...