Bombay High Court Quashes Abetment of Suicide Case Against In-Laws Due to Lack of Proximate Cause. Allegations of cruelty and dowry demand not directly linked to suicide as deceased was living separately for years before the incident.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, who are the husband and in-laws of the deceased Aasma, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of Crime No.196 of 2019 registered at Shrirampur City Police Station, Ahmednagar for offences under Sections 498-A, 306, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and the consequent charge-sheet. The complaint was lodged by the father of the deceased alleging that after two months of marriage, the applicants subjected the deceased to cruelty and demanded Rs.50,000/-. The deceased was driven out of the matrimonial home and later committed suicide on 10-03-2019. The applicants contended that the deceased was living separately from them for about 8 years prior to the suicide, and there was no proximate cause linking the alleged cruelty to the suicide. The court examined the allegations and found that the deceased had been living separately from the applicants for a considerable period, and there was no material to show that the applicants instigated or abetted the suicide. The court held that the ingredients of Section 306 IPC were not made out and that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - Allegations of cruelty and abetment of suicide against in-laws - Deceased living separately for years - No proximate cause - Held that continuation of proceedings would be abuse of process of law (Paras 7-10).

B) Indian Penal Code - Abetment of Suicide - Section 306 IPC - Proximate Cause - Deceased committed suicide after living separately from accused for about 8 years - Allegations of dowry demand and cruelty not directly linked to suicide - Held that ingredients of abetment are not made out (Paras 7-10).

C) Indian Penal Code - Cruelty by Husband or Relatives - Section 498-A IPC - Living Separately - Allegations of cruelty prior to separation - No evidence of cruelty proximate to suicide - Held that proceedings are liable to be quashed (Paras 7-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 498-A, 306, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC when the deceased was living separately from the accused for a considerable period and there is no direct nexus between the alleged cruelty and the suicide.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the criminal application and quashed Crime No.196 of 2019 registered at Shrirampur City Police Station and all consequential proceedings.

Law Points

  • Quashing of criminal proceedings
  • Abetment of suicide
  • Section 306 IPC
  • Section 498-A IPC
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Proximate cause
  • Living separately
  • In-laws
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (12) 32

Criminal Application No. 119 of 2020

2022-12-16

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, Abhay S. Waghwase

Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar for Applicants, Mr. M.M. Nerlikar APP for Respondent No.1-State, Mr. Shaikh Tarek Mobin H. for Respondent No.2

Sayyed Lal Amir Sayyed and others

The State of Maharashtra and Raheman Balambhai Shaikh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR and charge-sheet for offences under Sections 498-A, 306, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Applicants (accused) seek quashing of Crime No.196 of 2019 and consequential charge-sheet.

Filing Reason

Allegations of cruelty and dowry demand leading to suicide of deceased Aasma.

Issues

Whether the FIR and charge-sheet for offences under Sections 498-A, 306, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC when the deceased was living separately from the accused for about 8 years prior to suicide.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that the deceased was living separately for about 8 years and there was no proximate cause linking alleged cruelty to suicide. Respondent-State opposed the quashing, but the court found no direct nexus.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 306 IPC, there must be a proximate and direct link between the alleged cruelty and the suicide. When the deceased was living separately from the accused for a considerable period, the ingredients of abetment are not made out, and continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

Judgment Excerpts

By way of instant application, applicants herein, who are arraigned as accused in Crime No.196 of 2019... are praying for quashing the said crime and consequential charge-sheet arising out of it. Brief background of the case: Raheman Shaikh, father of deceased Aasma, approached Shrirampur City Police Station... informing about his deceased daughter... Learned Advocate for the applicants... pointed out that marriage... and that the deceased was living separately for about 8 years.

Procedural History

FIR registered on 11-03-2019; investigation concluded and charge-sheet filed; applicants filed Criminal Application No.119 of 2020 under Section 482 CrPC for quashing; heard on 16-12-2022 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498-A, 306, 323, 504, 506, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Bar Association Election Dispute. Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Abetment of Suicide Case Against In-Laws Due to Lack of Proximate Cause. Allegations of cruelty and dowry demand not directly linked to suicide as deceased was living separately for years before the incident.