Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as death caused by septicemia from stab wound was not intentional, reducing offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 48
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sangit s/o Rajaram Ingle, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, for the murder of Ganesh Ingale under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500. The incident occurred on 17.01.2012 in village Varvat Bakal. Earlier that day, the appellant had slapped and abused the deceased's wife, Ranjana (PW1), leading to a non-cognizable complaint. Later that evening, around 8:30 PM, when the deceased came out of his house, the appellant confronted Ranjana about the complaint. The deceased tried to intervene, and the appellant stabbed him in the abdomen with a Gupti and also struck him on the back. The deceased was taken to hospital and died on 21.01.2012 due to septicemia. The appellant was charged and convicted. In appeal, the High Court examined whether the offence amounted to murder. The court noted that the incident arose from a sudden quarrel without premeditation, and the appellant did not act in a cruel or unusual manner. The medical evidence indicated that the injury was not on a vital part and death was caused by septicemia, not directly by the stab wound. The court held that the case fell under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, making it culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The conviction under Section 302 IPC was set aside and altered to Section 304 Part I IPC. Considering the appellant had already undergone about 7 years of imprisonment, the court sentenced him to the period already undergone and directed his release unless required in another case.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Culpable Homicide - Section 302, 304 Part I, Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC - Sudden Fight - The appellant was convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing the deceased with a Gupti. The High Court held that the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, and the appellant did not act in a cruel or unusual manner. The death was caused by septicemia, not directly by the stab wound. The court altered the conviction to Section 304 Part I IPC, sentencing the appellant to the period already undergone (about 7 years). (Paras 1-20)

B) Evidence - Medical Evidence - Cause of Death - Septicemia - The medical evidence showed that the deceased died due to septicemia resulting from the stab wound, not from the injury itself. The court noted that the injury was not on a vital part and the appellant did not intend to cause death. This supported the finding that the offence was not murder but culpable homicide not amounting to murder. (Paras 10-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder is sustainable or whether the offence falls under a lesser degree of culpable homicide.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The conviction under Section 302 IPC is set aside and altered to Section 304 Part I IPC. The appellant is sentenced to the period of imprisonment already undergone (about 7 years). He shall be released forthwith unless required in any other case.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 304 Part I IPC
  • Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC
  • culpable homicide not amounting to murder
  • sudden fight
  • lack of premeditation
  • medical evidence
  • septicemia
  • intention to cause death
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (03) 297

Criminal Appeal No. 195 of 2016

2019-03-15

SUNIL B. SHUKRE, S.M. MODAK

Shri S.V. Sirpurkar for appellant, Mrs. M.H. Deshmukh for respondent

Sangit s/o Rajaram Ingle

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or reduction of sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of Ganesh Ingale by stabbing with a Gupti.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant on 28.03.2016 in S.T. No. 45 of 2012, sentencing him to life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable. Whether the offence falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, making it culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, and the death was due to septicemia, not the injury itself. Respondent argued that the appellant intentionally caused the stab wound, leading to death, and the conviction under Section 302 IPC was correct.

Ratio Decidendi

The incident arose from a sudden quarrel without premeditation, and the appellant did not act in a cruel or unusual manner. The medical evidence showed death was caused by septicemia, not directly by the injury, indicating lack of intention to cause death. Hence, the case falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, making it culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

There was trifle incident prior to the incident of murder. Accused got annoyed and pierced a Gupti into the abdomen of the deceased. Septicemia was the cause of death. The incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation. The appellant did not act in a cruel or unusual manner.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted on 28.03.2016 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, in S.T. No. 45 of 2012 for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 195 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The appeal was reserved on 13.02.2019 and pronounced on 15.03.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 304 Part I, 300 Exception 4, 323, 504, 506, 307
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Independent Witnesses. DRI Officers' Failure to Comply with Mandatory Provisions of NDPS Act, 1985 Renders Seizure Doubtful.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as death caused by septicemia from stab wound was not intentional, reducing offence to culpable homicide not amoun...