Search Results for "Article 181"

625 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 625 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Review Jurisdiction Improperly Exercised by High Court. The Court held that the High Court's review order did not satisfy the grounds under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC and was an abuse of process.

The present appeal arises from a long-standing property dispute concerning premises No. 43, Prithviraj Road, New Delhi. The property originally belong...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or perversity in the arbitrator's findings.

The petitioner, Rajuram Sawaji Purohit, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to set a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order Terminating Arbitration for Lack of Arbitration Agreement. Developer Fails to Prove Existence of Arbitration Clause in Development Agreement with Cooperative Housing Society.

The petitioner, M/s. Panama Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Judicial Officer for Alleged Disregard of Precedents. Court holds that mere erroneous orders or non-mention of cited judgments do not constitute contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Yogesh Waman Athavale, an advocate practicing in Chiplun, filed a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Declaration under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016. The court quashed reassessment and prosecution notices under Section 276CC of Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that valid declaration under the Scheme grants immunity.

The petitioners, Umesh D. Ganore and Mangesh D. Ganore, filed two writ petitions challenging the decision of the Revenue Authority in not accepting th...