Bombay High Court Directs University to Consider Employee's Pension Scheme Based on Appointment Date Prior to 31 October 2005. Petitioner's appointment order dated 17.10.2005 and joining report dated 29.10.2005 held to be before the cut-off date for Defined Contributory Pension Scheme under Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shri Snehal S/o Baburao Kuwar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging the applicability of the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme (New Pension Scheme) to his service, pursuant to Government Resolution dated 31st October, 2005. The petitioner was appointed as a Junior Assistant by the Kavayitri Bahinbai Chaudhari North Maharashtra University (Respondent No.4) pursuant to an advertisement dated 07.08.2004. As part of the selection process, he was directed to produce documents on 12.08.2005. On 17.10.2005, he was issued an appointment order placing him on probation and granting him time up to 17.11.2005 to report for duties. The petitioner submitted a joining report dated 29.10.2005 to the Registrar of the University, but due to Diwali vacation, no authority was available to receive it. The petitioner sought a direction that the respondent authorities not make the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme applicable to him, as his appointment was prior to 31.10.2005. The learned advocate for the petitioner stated that he would not press the challenge to the Government Resolution itself, but only sought that his claim be decided in light of his appointment order and placement. The court considered the sequence of events and found that the petitioner's appointment order was issued on 17.10.2005 and his joining report was dated 29.10.2005, both prior to the cut-off date of 31.10.2005. The court held that the petitioner's appointment is prior to the cut-off date and directed the respondent authorities to consider his claim for pension under the old scheme, not the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pension - Defined Contributory Pension Scheme - Cut-off Date - Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005 - The petitioner was appointed by order dated 17.10.2005 and submitted joining report on 29.10.2005, both prior to the cut-off date of 31.10.2005. The court held that the petitioner's appointment is prior to the cut-off date and directed the respondent authorities to consider his claim for pension under the old scheme, not the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme. (Paras 1-6)

B) Service Law - Appointment - Joining Report - Probation - The petitioner was issued an appointment order on 17.10.2005 placing him on probation as Junior Assistant, and he submitted his joining report on 29.10.2005. The court noted that the joining report was tendered before the cut-off date, despite the University being on Diwali vacation. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner's appointment is prior to 31st October, 2005, so as to exclude him from the applicability of the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme (New Pension Scheme) introduced by Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider the claim of the petitioner for pension under the old scheme, not the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme, as his appointment is prior to 31st October, 2005.

Law Points

  • Pension Scheme
  • Cut-off Date
  • Appointment Date
  • Joining Date
  • Government Resolution
  • Defined Contributory Pension Scheme
  • New Pension Scheme
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (01) 8

WRIT PETITION NO. 12622 OF 2022

2023-01-11

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Mr. Lalitkumar S. Mahajan, Mr. S.G. Sangle, Mr. A.B. Girase

Shri Snehal S/o Baburao Kuwar

The State of Maharashtra, The Secretary, Finance Department, The Joint Director, Higher Education, Jalgaon Region, Kavayitri Bahinbai Chaudhari, North Maharashtra University

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging applicability of Defined Contributory Pension Scheme to petitioner's service.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondent authorities not to make the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme applicable to the petitioner's service.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's appointment was prior to 31st October, 2005, but the University sought to apply the New Pension Scheme introduced by Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005.

Issues

Whether the petitioner's appointment is prior to 31st October, 2005, so as to exclude him from the applicability of the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's advocate submitted that the petitioner would not press the challenge to the Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005, but sought that his claim be decided in light of his appointment order and placement. Respondents' advocates opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioner's appointment order was issued on 17.10.2005 and his joining report was dated 29.10.2005, both prior to the cut-off date of 31.10.2005. Therefore, the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme introduced by Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005 is not applicable to him.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner put-forth prayer clause-C as under: “C) By way of appropriate Writ, order or direction in the like nature, the Hon’ble High Court may kindly direct the respondent authorities not to make applicable the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme (New Pension Scheme) to the service of petitioner, pursuance to the Government Resolution dated 31st October, 2005, as the appointment of the petitioner is prior to 31st October, 2005.” Having considered the strenuous submissions of the learned advocates representing the respective sides, we find that the sequence of events need to be set out as under: A) Respondent no.4-University published an advertisement dated 07.08.2004... B) The petitioner applied... C) On 17.10.2005 he was issued with an appointment order placing him on probation as a Junior Assistant... D) A specific statement on oath has been made in the pleadings that the petitioner reached the University to tender a joining report dated 29.10.2005... E) Since the University was on Diwali Vacation, no authority was available...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 12622 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad. Rule was issued and made returnable forthwith, and the petition was heard finally by consent of parties.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Tenant at will cannot claim adverse possession; suit for possession based on title is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Ac...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Anticipatory Bail for Principal Accused of Rape. Delay in FIR Explained by Threat of Job Loss, Defence of Counterblast to Be Proved at Trial.