Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Declaration under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016. The court quashed reassessment and prosecution notices under Section 276CC of Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that valid declaration under the Scheme grants immunity.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 49
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Umesh D. Ganore and Mangesh D. Ganore, filed two writ petitions challenging the decision of the Revenue Authority in not accepting their declarations under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016. The Scheme was framed under Section 183 of the Finance Act, 2016, allowing assessees to declare undisclosed income and, upon acceptance, be spared from penalty and prosecution. The petitioners made a common declaration on 29th September 2016 for assessment years 2011-12 to 2014-15, disclosing total undisclosed income of Rs. 1,81,20,518/-. They paid the required tax, surcharge, and penalty. However, the Revenue Authority rejected the declaration, leading to reassessment notices and prosecution notices under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court considered the provisions of the Scheme and found that the petitioners had fulfilled all conditions. The rejection was without valid grounds. Consequently, the court allowed the petitions, quashing the rejection order, the reassessment notices, and the prosecution notices. The court held that once a valid declaration is made and accepted, the assessee is entitled to immunity from reassessment and prosecution.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 - Declaration of Undisclosed Income - The petitioner made a declaration under the Scheme for assessment years 2011-12 to 2014-15. The Revenue Authority rejected the declaration without valid reasons. The court examined the provisions of the Scheme and held that the rejection was not sustainable as the petitioner had complied with the conditions. (Paras 1-5)

B) Income Tax - Reassessment - Validity of Notices - The reassessment notices issued by the Assessing Officer for the assessment years covered by the declaration were challenged. The court held that once a valid declaration is made under the Scheme, the reassessment proceedings cannot be initiated. (Paras 2-5)

C) Income Tax - Prosecution - Section 276CC - The prosecution notices under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were challenged. The court held that if the declaration under the Scheme is accepted, the declarant is spared from prosecution. Therefore, the prosecution notices were invalid. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Revenue Authority was justified in rejecting the petitioner's declaration under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 and whether the subsequent reassessment notices and prosecution notices under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the rejection of the declaration, the reassessment notices, and the prosecution notices.

Law Points

  • Income Declaration Scheme
  • 2016
  • Section 183 of Finance Act
  • Section 276CC of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Reassessment
  • Prosecution
  • Declaration of undisclosed income
  • Acceptance of declaration
  • Conditions of scheme
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (03) 187

Writ Petition No. 14709 of 2018 and Writ Petition No. 14710 of 2018

2019-03-08

Akil Kureshi, M.S. Sanklecha

Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar with Mr. Rohan Deshpande and Ms. Alisha Pinto for the Petitioner; Mr. Sham Walve for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

Umesh D. Ganore and Mangesh D. Ganore

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax1, Nashik & Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging rejection of declaration under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 and subsequent reassessment and prosecution notices.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the rejection of declaration, reassessment notices, and prosecution notices.

Filing Reason

Revenue Authority rejected the petitioner's declaration under the Scheme and issued reassessment and prosecution notices.

Issues

Whether the rejection of the declaration under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 was valid. Whether the reassessment notices and prosecution notices under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the declaration was valid and complied with all conditions of the Scheme. Respondents argued that the rejection was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

A valid declaration under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, once accepted, grants immunity from reassessment and prosecution under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The rejection of the declaration without valid grounds is unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

These Petitions involve common question of law. Petitioner has challenged a decision of the Revenue Authority in not accepting the Petitioner's declaration under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016. Petitioner has further challenged the re-assessment notices issued by the Assessing Officer for the assessment years covered under such declaration as well as orders of assessment passed pursuant to such notices. Petitioner has also challenged notices for prosecution issued by the competent authority under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay challenging the rejection of their declaration under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, and the subsequent reassessment and prosecution notices. The court heard both petitions together and disposed of them by a common judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Finance Act, 2016: 183
  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 276CC
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Declaration under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016. The court quashed reassessment and prosecution notices under Section 276CC of Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that valid declaration und...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court "Supreme Court Upholds Restoration of Suit for Specific Performance Despite Initial Procedural Dismissal: Cause of Action Distinction Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Clarified" "Procedural bars must yield to substantive justice when causes of action in se...